User talk:Spectra321578

This page was nominated for deletion on 24 July 2025. The result of the discussion was keep.

January 2025

Hello, I'm Vanderwaalforces. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Confirmed. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:42, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Без названия1 20250110231104.png

A tag has been placed on File:Без названия1 20250110231104.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 16:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spectra Prime: Rise of Algorithm (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spectra Prime: Rise of Algorithm and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:28, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spectra321578! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:28, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spectra Prime Rise of Algorithm logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spectra Prime Rise of Algorithm logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 17:41, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If they wrote that he is not the one, then it is not worth discussing, a forehead in the form of a diamond, lines above the mouth and cheeks, and of course sharp lines, so it is not what you think. Spectra321578 (talk) 06:05, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2025 May newsletter

The second round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 April at 23:59 UTC. To reiterate what we said in the previous newsletter, we are no longer disqualifying contestants based on how many points (now known as round points) they received. Instead, the contestants with the highest round-point totals now receive tournament points at the end of each round. These tournament points are carried over between rounds, and can only be earned if a competitor is among the top 16 round-point scorers at the end of each round. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned.

Round 2 was quite competitive. Four contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and eight scored more than 500 points (including one who has withdrawn). The following competitors scored at least 800 points:

BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,233 round points from 24 good articles, 28 Did you know articles, and one In the news nomination, mainly about athletes and politicians
Thebiguglyalien (submissions) with 1,127 round points, almost entirely from two high-multiplier featured articles on Black Widow (Natasha Romanova) and Grace Coolidge, in addition to two GAs and two reviews
History6042 (submissions) with 1,088 round points from four featured lists about Michelin-starred restaurants, nine good articles and a good topic mostly on Olympic-related subjects, seven ITN articles, and dozens of reviews
Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,085 round points from three FAs, one GA, and four DYKs on military history, as well as 18 reviews
Arconning (submissions) with 887 round points, mostly from four FLs, six GAs, and seven DYKs on Olympic topics, along with more than two dozen reviews

In addition, we would like to recognize Generalissima (submissions) for her efforts; she scored 801 round points but withdrew before the end of the round.

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 13 featured articles, 20 featured lists, 4 featured-topic articles, 138 good articles, 7 good-topic articles, and more than 100 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 19 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 300 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spectra Prime.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spectra Prime.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:13, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What, I can't upload my logos anymore? Spectra321578 (talk) 20:05, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Spectra321578! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 08:31, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

WikiCup 2025 July newsletter

The third round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 June. This round was again competitive, with three contestants scoring more than 1,000 round points:

BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,314 round points, mostly from articles about athletes and politicians, including 20 good articles and 48 did you know articles
Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,197 round points, mostly from military history articles, including 9 featured topic articles, two featured articles, and four good articles
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 1,055 round points, mostly from television station articles, including 27 good articles and 9 good topic articles

Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 4 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 1 featured picture, 9 featured-topic articles, 149 good articles, 27 good-topic articles, and more than 90 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 18 In the News articles, and they have conducted more than 200 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Template: Barnstar of Wisdom Owl.png

Hello, Spectra321578. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template: Barnstar of Wisdom Owl.png, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:12, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Awarding me with barnstrans

It turns out to be unfair, it means that everyone has Barnstars, but I don’t, I reward them, but no one rewards me, and because of this I’m angry as a dog.

I ask those who care to reward me with at least one Barnstar🥺 Spectra321578 (talk) 07:37, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars are given to editors to show appreciation for their contributions. If you edit Wikipedia with the expectation of a reward, then you lose sight of what Wikipedia is really about. We're all here to contribute to something larger than ourselves, and we do it without pay, knowing that most readers will never know who we are.

I suggest that you ask yourself this question: Are you here to build an encyclopedia? Or are you here to be rewarded or to seek validation from others? If the answer to the last question is "yes", then Wikipedia may not be for you. Editing Wikipedia is often a thankless hobby, and that's something we all have to accept. - ZLEA _T\^C 09:26, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, I'm editing my page and I want a gagrad for it. Userpage Barnstar That's what Spectra321578 (talk) 09:48, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have spammed multiple editors (Ferien, Arad, Qwerfjkl, and Masum Ibn Musa) and several project talk pages (Wikipedia:Barnstars/Requests, and WikiProject Wikipedia Awards) over the past few days. Please stop. These actions give the impression that you're not here to build an encyclopedia, and will likely get you blocked if you continue. - ZLEA _T\^C 16:36, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding denunciations

Gentlemen Wikipedians, what kind of denunciations are these to one person?

As soon as I'm about to write for Barnstar, you immediately start writing denunciations, immediately ask for forgiveness or I'll leave Wikipedia Spectra321578 (talk) 09:54, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. eviolite (talk) 14:08, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Other account?

Hi, is the Lwlvlad931 user account also yours? And/or do you have any other accounts? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is not my account, most likely it is fake, I ask you not to ban me, I have already been blocked in the Russian segment, please do not block Spectra321578 (talk) 15:22, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and in the Ukrainian Wikipedia, and on Commons. That's probably going to get you globally locked whether I block you here or not.

The Ukrainian admins seem to think you're Lwlvlad931, hence the question. And no, it's not a "fake" account, whatever that means.

You didn't answer my question about other accounts you have? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:28, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I replied well stop blocking me already I want to edit what is not clear I want to remain on Wikipedia not blocked and when they block the page is deleted please don't 🥺🥺🥺🥺 Spectra321578 (talk) 15:33, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:44, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Barnstars/Requests

Wikipedia:Barnstars/Requests, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Barnstars/Requests and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Barnstars/Requests during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. ZLEA _T\^C 17:01, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You blocked me, have you forgotten? Unblock me please, I won't do it again Spectra321578 (talk) 17:03, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request for account

Hello, I apologize for my crimes

I understand that my edits were considered disruptive, and I sincerely apologize for my actions. I realize now that I did not fully understand or follow Wikipedia's guidelines, and I take full responsibility for that.

I genuinely want to learn from this experience and contribute positively in the future. I will make sure to read and follow all policies, and I am committed to editing in a constructive and respectful way from now on.

I kindly ask for a second chance to prove that I can be a valuable member of the community.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

(Spectra321578 (talk) 18:15, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the unblock request form as described in your block notice and describe what it was that got you blocked. If you are unsure of what your "crimes" are, how will you avoid them in the future? Be specific and please do not use an LMM, use your own words. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:21, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Spectra321578

User:Spectra321578, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Spectra321578 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Spectra321578 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 21:07, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Spectra321578/TWA/Earth

User:Spectra321578/TWA/Earth, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Spectra321578/TWA/Earth and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Spectra321578/TWA/Earth during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 21:09, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Spectra321578/TWA/Earth/2

User:Spectra321578/TWA/Earth/2, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Spectra321578/TWA/Earth/2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Spectra321578/TWA/Earth/2 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Sundostund mppria ^{(talk / contribs)} 21:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]