User talk:Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb

Raid on Lawrencetown (1754) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Raid on Lawrencetown (1754). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Raid on Lawrencetown (1754)

Hello, Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raid on Lawrencetown (1754), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Raid on Lawrencetown (1754)

Hello, Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Raid on Lawrencetown".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Leblanc family

Hello, Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username ZDRX, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Leblanc family, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ZDRX}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

THEZDRX _{(User) |}_(Contact) 04:48, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Jacinto Bondanza Castro

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jacinto Bondanza Castro, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:42, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Protective Allied Army of the Law

Are you translating this article from Spanish (es:Ejército Aliado Protector de la Ley)? If so please read this Wikipedia:Translation and this in particular WP:TFOLWP. It helps if you add references first before adding text as well. -- Recon rabbit 13:49, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I really didn’t even see that there was a Spanish version. I was just finding references online. Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb (talk) 14:10, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are Spanish versions of several articles you have written. They will be useful if you want to write more. I have add language links so you can find them from the page like Battle of Llano El Espino, es:Batalla de Llano El Espino. -- Recon rabbit 14:19, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb (talk) 14:34, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hezekiah Healy

The article Hezekiah Healy has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. 45dogs (they/them) (talk) 02:27, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added a reference. Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb (talk) 02:29, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hezekiah Healy moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hezekiah Healy. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 45dogs (they/them) (talk) 02:29, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, apologies, I didn't realize you just added a source right before I moved it to draftspace. I am sorry for that. If you wish, you may move it back to mainspace. 45dogs (they/them) (talk) 02:30, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s ok! Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb (talk) 02:31, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, If you continue with adding stuff to the mainspace without it being fully completed (which is fine, just sometimes leads to situations like this), I would highly recommend putting up Template:Under construction or Template:In use. If you want to automate the process of putting those up, I would suggest installing twinkle if you don't already have it. Again, apologies for any interruptions I might have caused. Happy editing :) 45dogs (they/them) (talk) 02:43, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh ok thank you, I was not familiar with that feature. Thank you! Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb (talk) 03:03, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In fact I just completed the draft and moved it to an actual page. I just randomly decided to make the page since I’m from the area. Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb (talk) 03:05, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It looks good, from what I know of Wikipedia's style. I do have to ask; where does "It is likely that he actually improved the shuttle, rather than inventing it" come from? Is it based on what one of the sources say? Other than that the article looks to be neutral, no conflict of interest that I can tell of. So, good job :) 45dogs (they/them) (talk) 03:13, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think I lost the source while the whole page situation was going on since I was doing that section. But basically most evidence shows that it was someone else that invented and patented it, but he more likely just improved it. Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb (talk) 03:19, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just added the missing reference as we speak. Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb (talk) 03:23, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And right as I was going to add a 'citation needed'! Good work :) 45dogs (they/them) (talk) 03:26, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! :) Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb (talk) 03:30, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just added a source and am in the process of adding more. Shsusbsvusbsvzjsb (talk) 02:30, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Hezekiah Healy

A tag has been placed on Draft:Hezekiah Healy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 45dogs (they/them) (talk) 03:08, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]