User talk:SAN2221

Welcome!

Hello, SAN2221, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Xegma(talk) 18:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sana Raees Khan moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sana Raees Khan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and WP:BIO1E. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. jlwoodwa (talk) 21:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sana Raees Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sana Raees Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sana Raees Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 21:02, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohit Bharatiya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohit Bharatiya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohit Bharatiya (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

jellyfish ✉ 21:59, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Love.potion1021 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Love.potion1021. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 14:50, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheresNoTime kindly check my edits and review the block and i have lots of edits and i have nothing to do with this account mentioned and i have been linked with. I only contribute with proper citations and reliable source. I edited twinkle khanna's account with proper citation from reliable source and reasoning and also i have contributed to that article many times before too. i have also contributed to many other articles also. i never try to edit or create any articles if its deleted for proper reason.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SAN2221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have no link to the mentioned account. SAN2221 (talk) 16:11, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Every sock puppet denies being one, since that is the whole point. You'll have to do better than that. 331dot (talk) 19:41, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SAN2221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

kindly check my edits, i have lots of edits and i have nothing to do with this account mentioned. WHY WILL I CREATE ACCOUNT IN 2024 ONE YEAR BEFORE IF I NEED TO EDIT ANY ARTICLE NOW in 2025. my account is one year old. and i have edited many other articles too. SAN2221 (talk) 09:59, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Technically indistinguishable to Yahhve, Nucar2025. Yamla (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SAN2221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been again linked with few more accounts Yahhve, Nucar2025 and Yamla which are again not known to me. Kindly review my account as its been blocked for linked with accounts not known to me.

Decline reason:

When you registered this account a year ago, I believe you were a returning user, and I think I know which account you used before. In any case, there is sufficient compelling evidence to link you to multiple other accounts, and you simply saying you aren't related to them isn't enough (apart from Yamla, that account I do believe isn't yours!). I'm declining your appeal. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:18, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SAN2221 (talk) 12:32, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved your unblock request to the bottom of the page. In future, try to put new messages at the bottom to make it easier to follow what is happening. Also, Yamla isn't one of the accounts you were linked to. Yamla is the person who declined your previous unblock request so their decline wae signed with their name. QwertyForest (talk) 16:11, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@QwertyForest, ok i have been linked to different accounts so i felt if yamla was also one of them. SAN2221 (talk) 07:07, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SAN2221 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agree that i am a returning user but the account i am linked to is not mine. i had different user account before which was blocked and i accept that and when i started with this account i had only this account. my current account was deleted for been linked with account which is not mine thats what i want to place in front of reviewers. SAN2221 (talk) 07:22, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have independently confirmed the checkuser findings. I am declining your unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 13:35, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What was/were the name(s) of your previous account(s)? --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DoubleGrazing my old account was in name dsn18 and rest all accounts i have been linked to are not mine. SAN2221 (talk) 09:48, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. If that's the case, then that doesn't change the fact that you're a sock; it only changes whose sock you are. If you wish to appeal your block, you need to go back to the DSN18 account and do it from there. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:15, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser note

Sanju2024, SAN2221 and Yahhve are all Confirmed to each other.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:34, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]