User talk:Royalorders
Welcome!
[edit]
Hello, Royalorders, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! AnupamTalk 13:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
|
|
Nomination of Earl of Rothes (Baronage of Scotland) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earl of Rothes (Baronage of Scotland) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.— Arcaist (contr—talk) 11:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Royalorders (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
- @Asilvering
- I kindly ask you to unblock my account. I have seen that Mediascriptor's account has been unblocked and I have carefully read the reasons and recommendations to avoid overlap in our activities.
- I am committed to following these recommendations and would like to assure you that my actions were never intended to mislead other editors or vandalize Wikipedia content. I would very much like to continue writing on Wikipedia.
- Thank you in advance for your understanding.
- Royalorders (talk) 12:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= :@[[User:Asilvering|Asilvering]] :I kindly ask you to unblock my account. I have seen that Mediascriptor's account has been unblocked and I have carefully read the reasons and recommendations to avoid overlap in our activities. :I am committed to following these recommendations and would like to assure you that my actions were never intended to mislead other editors or vandalize Wikipedia content. I would very much like to continue writing on Wikipedia. :Thank you in advance for your understanding. :[[User:Royalorders|Royalorders]] ([[User talk:Royalorders#top|talk]]) 12:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1= :@[[User:Asilvering|Asilvering]] :I kindly ask you to unblock my account. I have seen that Mediascriptor's account has been unblocked and I have carefully read the reasons and recommendations to avoid overlap in our activities. :I am committed to following these recommendations and would like to assure you that my actions were never intended to mislead other editors or vandalize Wikipedia content. I would very much like to continue writing on Wikipedia. :Thank you in advance for your understanding. :[[User:Royalorders|Royalorders]] ([[User talk:Royalorders#top|talk]]) 12:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1= :@[[User:Asilvering|Asilvering]] :I kindly ask you to unblock my account. I have seen that Mediascriptor's account has been unblocked and I have carefully read the reasons and recommendations to avoid overlap in our activities. :I am committed to following these recommendations and would like to assure you that my actions were never intended to mislead other editors or vandalize Wikipedia content. I would very much like to continue writing on Wikipedia. :Thank you in advance for your understanding. :[[User:Royalorders|Royalorders]] ([[User talk:Royalorders#top|talk]]) 12:18, 29 June 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Hi, can you explain your interest in the topics you've edited so far, please? -- asilvering (talk) 14:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Asilvering Hi, I am interested in topics concerning dynastic orders, knighthoods, and aristocratic titles in generalRoyalorders (talk) 15:05, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hm. I was worried you'd say that. The thing is, your edits on that topic have been rather more specific than "dynastic orders, knighthoods, and aristocratic titles" broadly. Do you care to revise that statement a bit to account for that? -- asilvering (talk) 15:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- @Asilvering Ah sorry, naively I did not understand the meaning of your question. Yes, I can't deny that I have written on the subject of dynastic orders on individuals on which @Mediascriptor had intervened. With the exception of the page on the Order of the Queen Tamara (1939) which does not mention either individual (but it is true that they are listed on the website of the royal house of Georgia). Nor can I deny that each reads the other's writings. If in the future I have to refrain from writing on the subjects on which @Mediascriptor writes, I commit myself as of now to do so, insofar as the personal pages of the two individuals have been deleted. Royalorders (talk) 16:59, 4 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hm. I was worried you'd say that. The thing is, your edits on that topic have been rather more specific than "dynastic orders, knighthoods, and aristocratic titles" broadly. Do you care to revise that statement a bit to account for that? -- asilvering (talk) 15:39, 4 July 2025 (UTC)