User talk:Politicsenthusiast06
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Politicsenthusiast06! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 18:47, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
CCF & NDP
[edit]Howdy. I oppose your addition of provincial & territorial results to the New Democratic Party article. But why, would you include CCF results? Anyways, I've mentioned your additions, at WP:CANADA. PS - I wish you'd make your proposals there, rather than jumping ahead & making such additions. GoodDay (talk) 01:03, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- I did reply to your comments under NDP: infobox, where you stated that you wouldn't oppose the Provincial data being added back due to the change with the Bloc Quebecois. Since there was no other replies i assumed that there was no major opposition and would be worth a shot at adding back. I now see that a new discussion under that thread took place since I expressed my opinion that we should include them. Also for the CCF, the provincial sections of the NDP, to my understanding are just a named changed version of the CCF wing, unlike the federal party. So under their election results its standard to include CCF, in a different colour. However I was just restoring the original table so I don't know. Politicsenthusiast06 (talk) 01:16, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- The NDP is not the BQ. Also, the CCF have their own article. GoodDay (talk) 02:14, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
- Please note that since every provincial or territorial chapter of the NDP already has its own separate article as it is, we have an established consensus that the federal-level article does not need to include deep levels of detail about the provincial and territorial chapters — New Democratic Party does not need to exhaustively document every election result in every provincial or territorial legislature, since separate provincial/territorial-level articles already exist to cover that, and the infobox does not need to exhaustively document the NDP's standings in every individual provincial or territorial legislature, since separate provincial/territorial-level articles already exist to cover that. The federal-level article should only concern itself with the NDP's operations in federal politics, while stuff related to provincial or territorial politics belongs in the provincial and territorial articles.
The Bloc Québécois has nothing to do with it, since the Bloc Québécois only exists federally and doesn't have any provincial chapters under it, and the discussion at its talk page wasn't about anything like the same thing. Bearcat (talk) 01:21, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
2025 Canadian federal election and redistribution
[edit]Hi, I'm a confused about your revert of my edit here. There is also a comprehensive separate page on the 2022 redistribution, 2022 Canadian federal electoral redistribution, so I don't understand what you're getting at; readers can go there for that information. As I said, the 2015 Canadian federal election article doesn't have all this detail on redistribution, simply mentioning the increase in seats and linking to the dedicated 2012 Canadian federal electoral redistribution. If you feel strongly about the notional redistribution tables, sure we can have that, but I don't see why 2025 Canadian federal election ought to have a full explanation of the redistribution, or a breakdown on how every seat would have changed (especially since I did move that table over already). Can you expand on your reasoning? — Kawnhr (talk) 20:09, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- I apologize I thought you had just removed the table with the party seat change of the distribution. Which I think we should keep. The longer more comprehensive table of every ridings change should be moved to the redistribution page as it is excessive detail for the main election article. Politicsenthusiast06 (talk) 20:20, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
- I see, no worries. I'll make the edit again, then, but this time keeping the bit about notional results and the table. — Kawnhr (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Jäger Rosenberg for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jäger Rosenberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Yue🌙 22:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Darnelda Siegers for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darnelda Siegers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Darnelda Siegers
[edit]
Hello, Politicsenthusiast06. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Darnelda Siegers".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:25, 9 May 2025 (UTC)