User talk:Newinwiki8

This is Newinwiki8's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kocaeli health and technology university (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kocaeli health and technology university and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:46, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Newinwiki8! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:46, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kocaeli health and technology university (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kocaeli health and technology university and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:39, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kocaeli Health and Technology University (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kocaeli Health and Technology University and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:03, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple drafts

Please don't create multiple drafts on the same subject. This causes all sorts of confusion, and doesn't in any way increase the chances of the draft being accepted. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:06, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am a new editor and I am not exactly sure how to properly format the page. However, you can verify that the topic of the page is genuine and not promotional. I have included all the sources Newinwiki8 (talk) 12:10, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Newinwiki8. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Newinwiki8, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Newinwiki8|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:57, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:58, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you may be blocked from editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:01, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't know what the problem is with the page. The page is owned by Turkish Wikipedia. All rights reserved. You also think the cause of the problem is due to previous drafts. Instead of helping and improving the page, you are acting more hostilely. Newinwiki8 (talk) 14:04, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One more time: there is no evidence whatsoever in this article that the subject is notable. Notability is a hard requirement for inclusion in the encyclopaedia. As it stands, this article will not remain published, it will either be moved to drafts or taken to AfD. I asked you which you prefer, but you didn't reply, so I will have to make my own decision.

Also, the article is not "owned" by anybody; not you, not the Turkish Wikipedia, not the university in question. No one. And no rights are "reserved", other than what the Wikipedia licence terms stipulate. Please don't try any of this quasi-legal nonsense, or you may find yourself blocked for legal threats.

And please, skip that "hostilely" (sic) stuff, after you've come to my talk page to call me stupid. Make sure that was your last personal attack here.

Finally, one last time: do not remove maintenance templates from articles without addressing the problems they highlight.

Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:22, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I understand the concerns regarding notability. The university is listed in Times Higher Education and other independent sources, and I will add these references to improve the article. If you have any specific recommendations on how to better demonstrate notability, I would appreciate your guidance. Also, I apologize if my previous comments seemed inappropriate. I will ensure that all issues raised are properly addressed before making any further edits Newinwiki8 (talk) 14:27, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“I have added multiple reliable sources, including WHED (World Higher Education Database), AD Scientific Index, and other reputable academic rankings. These sources confirm the university’s existence and relevance. Please review the updates, and let me know if further improvements are needed. Thank you.” Newinwiki8 (talk) 14:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Kocaeli Health and Technology University.

You also have to address the questions about your connection to Kocaeli Health and Technology University, and whether you are compensated by them in any way. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 15:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I want to clarify that I am a student at Kocaeli Health and Technology University and have no financial affiliation with the institution. I am not being compensated in any way for editing this article. My sole intention was to improve the article by adding reliable sources and ensuring that the university is fairly represented, just like many other universities that have pages on Wikipedia, even those without significant recognition.

I have addressed the concerns raised by adding multiple reputable sources, including WHED, AD Scientific Index, and Times Higher Education. These sources confirm the university’s notability. Given these improvements, I kindly request a review of the article and reconsideration of the maintenance templates.

Thank you for your time and consideration.”* Newinwiki8 (talk) 15:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the templates again. Database listings and similar sources are very far from providing significant coverage. If you do add sufficient sourcing you should still allow the templates to remain to allow an editor without any connection to the organisation to evaluate it. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 15:49, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would add to this that since Newinwiki8 is self-evidently unable to evaluate notability, they by definition cannot also ascertain whether or not sufficient evidence thereof has been provided.

@Newinwiki8, please do not remove any more maintenance tags, or you will be sanctioned. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:53, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“I acknowledge your feedback and will not remove the templates again. I have added multiple sources, but I understand that independent editors should evaluate the article’s notability. If there are specific types of sources needed, I would appreciate guidance on how to improve the article further. Thank you for your time.” Newinwiki8 (talk) 16:02, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Newinwiki8, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Monmtiiii (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. .

Asking another editor to remove the maintenance tags is no different from doing it yourself. bonadea contributions talk 20:34, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' user pages without their permission. Instead, please bring the matter to their talk page and let them edit their user page themselves if they agree on a need to do so. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on user page etiquette. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:27, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kocaeli Health and Technology University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kocaeli. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 16 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kocaeli Health and Technology University moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kocaeli Health and Technology University 2. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:52, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]