User talk:Moscriptcallum

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Moscriptcallum, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to The Price (The Last of Us) seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Introduction and Getting started
Contributing to Wikipedia
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:01, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Rhain. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Last of Us season 2 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 06:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh sorry, yes. i will leave an explanation 2601:249:8200:8390:245E:F931:25EE:1E02 (talk) 06:22, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Please do so on the talk page. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 06:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at The Last of Us (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 06:23, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of George Jaques

The article George Jaques has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. MarcGarver (talk) 15:22, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

George Jaques moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to George Jaques. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Jaques (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:PRODUCER) but presently it is not clear that it does.

As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. The draft needs to meet, at least, WP:PRODUCER: please carefully peruse the criteria there. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being the subject (see WP:AUTOBIO) or being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the draft's talk page, the WP:THREE best sources that establish notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:PRODUCER criteria #1, because XXXXX").

Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:George Jaques and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 07:42, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moscriptcallum! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 07:42, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of accolades received by The Last of Us (TV series)

Hi, Moscriptcallum. Please stop adding the "2025 PRIDE AWARDS" to this article. As explained several times, all awards on the list require Wikipedia articles to demonstrate notability; the Pride Awards have no such article at present, hence their omission. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 06:49, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This also applies to this article. The awards do not have an independent Wikipedia article, and the information is referenced to a press release, which is not suitable in this context. If you feel strongly about its inclusion, please start a discussion at the talk page. Alternatively, you can look into starting a new article about the Pride Awards, which would likely justify its inclusion to the two articles mentioned here. Thank you. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 07:55, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The same also applies to the Gold Derby TV Awards, as you added here. To reiterate, per MOS:FILMACCOLADES, Awards included in lists should have a Wikipedia article to demonstrate notability. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:38, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you mentioned this:

Merced won the Next Generation Impact Award at the NHMC Impact Awards Gala for her roles in The Last of Us and Superman (2025), and Mazino received an honorable mention for Outstanding Supporting Performance from Gold House's Gold List in Television.

none of these of wiki pages. why does this paragraph stay? Moscriptcallum (talk) 00:49, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As demonstrated by your reply, both the NHMC Impact Awards Gala and Gold House have Wikipedia articles. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:52, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it's not a page, though. it's a link to a paragraph about the award. Moscriptcallum (talk) 00:54, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In my experience, that's generally enough to fulfil the requirements. Importantly, both accolades are also supported by reliable, independent sources to demonstrate their notability. If you believe they should be removed, though, you're welcome to make a case on the talk page. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:59, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of accolades received by The Last of Us (TV series)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of accolades received by The Last of Us (TV series), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:56, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Last of Us season 2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 07:45, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion here. Please contribute there instead of continuing to revert. If the consensus is in your favour, the information will be removed; until then, please leave the content as is. Thank you. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 07:51, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, such as those you made to Catherine Called Birdy (film), even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:03, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Moscriptcallum! Your additions to Harmonia (2026 film) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The4lines |||| (talk) 19:05, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

why delete when i can edit the page Moscriptcallum (talk) 19:41, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Harmonia (2026 film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Harmonia (2026 film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BOVINEBOY2008 08:43, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

it contains 5 unique sources. why doesn't that count? Moscriptcallum (talk) 06:45, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]