User talk:Miceofbankstation

This is Miceofbankstation's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guild of Young Freemen (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Declined for lack of citations. Best,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guild of Young Freemen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 08:59, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Miceofbankstation! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 08:59, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guild of Young Freemen (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guild of Young Freemen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:40, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guild of Young Freemen (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the presented sources do not appear reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guild of Young Freemen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 11:28, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Worshipful Company of Ironmongers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There is no mention of "Worshipful Company of Ironmongers" in any of the biographies you linked. Please do not add wp:red links as you have been doing, see wp:WTAF. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 01:41, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guild of Young Freemen (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guild of Young Freemen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 17:09, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guild of Young Freemen (May 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guild of Young Freemen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 07:04, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, I'm Macaddct1984. I noticed that in this edit to Guild of Young Freemen, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – macaddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:38, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I am learning how to use infobox and realised that I used an incorrect model of infobox for it more appropriate for livery companies instead of Guilds. I am diving deeply in history of these organisations which are not always full of information on the wiki. Thank you Miceofbankstation (talk) 23:53, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Make sure to use the edit summary to explain your actions, it really helps other editors. – macaddct1984 ^{(talk | contribs)} 23:58, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Miceofbankstation! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:23, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Guild of Young Freemen. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! I get that it's frustrating have an article nominated for deletion. Work with the process instead of attacking people who views don't line up with your own. I understand that you are new and this can be a little frustrating but tone it done a bit, your behavior at WP:RFPP isn't constructive. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:27, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fraser Peck

The article Fraser Peck has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN, being a councillor on a municipal council does not confer automatic notability. Similarly, being a Guild Warden, Liveryman and a member of a school alumni association does not make the individual notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 05:42, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James St John Davis

The article James St John Davis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN, being a councillor on a municipal council does not confer automatic notability. Similarly, being a Guild Warden, Liveryman and a chief risk officer does not make the individual notable. Also is reliant on primary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:32, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jaspreet Hodgson

The article Jaspreet Hodgson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN, being a councillor on a municipal council does not confer automatic notability. Similarly, being a member of the Guild of Young Freeman and a commercial account manager/vintry representative does not make the individual notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:34, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henry Pollard (British politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henry Pollard (British politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henry Pollard (British politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 17:31, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephen Hodgson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Hodgson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Hodgson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Liu1126 (talk) 18:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James St John Davis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James St John Davis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James St John Davis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 18:57, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Guild of Young Freemen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guild of Young Freemen, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guild of Young Freemen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fraser Peck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fraser Peck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraser Peck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul W (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Worshipful Company of International Bankers - notability

Please do not remove a headnote (in this case, concerning notability per WP:GNG) without improving the article (ie: adding significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources). I started an article Talk page discussion about this, and you appear to have ignored it. Paul W (talk) 20:55, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations of vandalism

I have just seen your page protection requests and accusations of vandalism in relation to the Worshipful Company of International Bankers and Guild of Young Freemen articles. You have not engaged with me about any of these edits, and, instead of trying to address the issues raised, you have now resorted to personal attacks (see WP:NPA). Please explain your conduct. Paul W (talk) 21:39, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Miceofbankstation, it is now more than two weeks since I left the above note, and you have not yet responded (though I did see that Dr Vulpes warned you that your behaviour at WP:RFPP was not constructive). Please explain. Paul W (talk) 18:42, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept my apologies — I’m still learning how to use this section effectively. I believe we’ve already moved past this topic, and I appreciate the constructive work we’ve done together to improve those pages. This process has given me a valuable opportunity to familiarise myself with Wikipedia and its policies, and I now believe that both pages look great and meet the expected standards. Miceofbankstation (talk) 22:40, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 23:19, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]