User talk:Marcelometal
Appearance
This is Marcelometal's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Thumbor (May 20)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thumbor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Marcelometal!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 09:32, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Thumbor has been accepted
[edit]
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
WeWake (talk) 04:36, 22 May 2025 (UTC)- @Marcelometal, I have accepted the article based on my review of sources and notability. However, I suggest you add more secondary sources to the article solidifying notability. I can see several mentions in books, perhaps courses, or other reliable/popular engineering or tech blogs that can be useful for this purpose. While there are references on the page, a lot of them come from the same source. Thanks! — WeWake (talk) 04:46, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! I appreciate your suggestions and I agree that adding more secondary sources will help further establish notability. I’ll work on incorporating additional references. Marcelo Jorge Vieira (metal) (talk) 17:15, 22 May 2025 (UTC)