User talk:Kpk22128

Welcome!

Hello, Kpk22128, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorials
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Bon courage (talk) 06:45, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 12:39, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kpk22128 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I was wrongly blocked for advertising or self-promotion. I was trying to contribute sincerely and now understand Wikipedia’s guidelines better, especially regarding notability and conflict of interest. I will be more careful and neutral in the future. I respectfully request a second chance.

Decline reason:

You say you were wrongly blocked. You spammed, I see nothing wrong with the block. Yamla (talk) 17:47, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kpk22128 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand now that my previous edits were seen as spammy or promotional, which was not my intention. I was unaware of the strict rules around external linking and conflict of interest. I've since taken time to read Wikipedia's policies on neutrality, notability, and COI, and I now realize how important they are to maintain the integrity of Wikipedia.

I sincerely apologize for any disruption caused and would like to request one more chance to contribute constructively and neutrally — without linking to any personal or promotional content. Thank you for considering my appeal. Kpk22128 (talk) 07:47, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You lost me at the first sentence- of course you intended to promote your blog. You may have thought you had a good reason, but that's what you were doing. That said, this doesn't mean you will be blocked forever, but you will need to describe what edits you want to make and convince us you will cease editing about your blog(which wouldn't be a reliable source even if it wasn't your blog). 331dot (talk) 09:28, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kpk22128 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my previous edits violated Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and promotional content policies. I apologize for editing in a way that promoted my blog. I now realize that even unintentional promotion can harm the integrity of the encyclopedia. I have since carefully read Wikipedia’s guidelines on neutrality, verifiability, reliable sourcing, and conflict of interest.

I want to assure you that I will no longer edit or add any content related to my blog or any topic where I have a personal interest. Going forward, I plan to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive and policy-compliant manner. This includes copyediting for grammar and clarity, improving article structure, and adding citations from reputable third-party sources on neutral topics like history, science, and general knowledge.

I am committed to respecting Wikipedia’s policies and community standards, and I sincerely hope to be given another opportunity to contribute positively. Thank you for considering my request.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=
I understand that my previous edits violated Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and promotional content policies. I apologize for editing in a way that promoted my blog. I now realize that even unintentional promotion can harm the integrity of the encyclopedia. I have since carefully read Wikipedia’s guidelines on neutrality, verifiability, reliable sourcing, and conflict of interest.

I want to assure you that I will no longer edit or add any content related to my blog or any topic where I have a personal interest. Going forward, I plan to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive and policy-compliant manner. This includes copyediting for grammar and clarity, improving article structure, and adding citations from reputable third-party sources on neutral topics like history, science, and general knowledge.

I am committed to respecting Wikipedia’s policies and community standards, and I sincerely hope to be given another opportunity to contribute positively. Thank you for considering my request.
 |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=
I understand that my previous edits violated Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and promotional content policies. I apologize for editing in a way that promoted my blog. I now realize that even unintentional promotion can harm the integrity of the encyclopedia. I have since carefully read Wikipedia’s guidelines on neutrality, verifiability, reliable sourcing, and conflict of interest.

I want to assure you that I will no longer edit or add any content related to my blog or any topic where I have a personal interest. Going forward, I plan to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive and policy-compliant manner. This includes copyediting for grammar and clarity, improving article structure, and adding citations from reputable third-party sources on neutral topics like history, science, and general knowledge.

I am committed to respecting Wikipedia’s policies and community standards, and I sincerely hope to be given another opportunity to contribute positively. Thank you for considering my request.
 |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=
I understand that my previous edits violated Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and promotional content policies. I apologize for editing in a way that promoted my blog. I now realize that even unintentional promotion can harm the integrity of the encyclopedia. I have since carefully read Wikipedia’s guidelines on neutrality, verifiability, reliable sourcing, and conflict of interest.

I want to assure you that I will no longer edit or add any content related to my blog or any topic where I have a personal interest. Going forward, I plan to contribute to Wikipedia in a constructive and policy-compliant manner. This includes copyediting for grammar and clarity, improving article structure, and adding citations from reputable third-party sources on neutral topics like history, science, and general knowledge.

I am committed to respecting Wikipedia’s policies and community standards, and I sincerely hope to be given another opportunity to contribute positively. Thank you for considering my request.
 |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}