User talk:Kolkata.gurgaon
December 2024
[edit]
Hello, I'm Cerebral726. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of publishers of children's books have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Cerebral726 (talk) 14:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sure, I thought the article wanted us to add more to the list as per our experience.
- I will learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you Kolkata.gurgaon (talk) 15:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Children's book illustration. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Cerebral726 (talk) 14:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Saudi Fund for Development
[edit]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Saudi Fund for Development, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:56, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cannabis and Cancer: Investigating the Healing Connection (March 22)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cannabis and Cancer: Investigating the Healing Connection and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Kolkata.gurgaon!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:25, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
|
- Hi, Thank you for your valuable feedback on my article. I understand that it needs to be more neutral and focused on summarizing information from secondary, reliable sources, rather than containing opinions or original research. I would like to edit the article to make it more suitable for publication, and would be grateful for your help in refining it to meet the encyclopedic tone and requirements. If you have any specific suggestions or examples on how to better align it with these guidelines, I would greatly appreciate your input. Looking forward to hearing from you! Kolkata.gurgaon (talk) 16:17, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cannabis and Cancer: Investigating the Healing Connection (March 29)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cannabis and Cancer: Investigating the Healing Connection and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hi, thanks for your feedback. I got the same feedback earlier as well and after that I total rewrote the article again. Can you please help giving some example as where I am going wrong. I will be happy if you could assist me in correcting this article. It is my first article for Wikipedia, any suggestions from you would be appreciated. Kolkata.gurgaon (talk) 10:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to complementary and alternative medicine, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Bon courage (talk) 11:02, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
March 2025
[edit] Hi Kolkata.gurgaon! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Bon courage (talk) 11:03, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- sure, thank you for your suggestion. I will take care of it. Best... Kolkata.gurgaon (talk) 11:31, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Mi.Mu Gloves for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mi.Mu Gloves until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Xrimonciam (talk) 08:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Best Train Routes Across Europe
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Best Train Routes Across Europe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 08:19, 30 April 2025 (UTC)
List of books on history of number systems moved to draftspace
[edit]Thanks for your contributions to List of books on history of number systems. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and No sources. NPP review. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creepTalk 15:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:List of books on history of number systems has a new comment
[edit]
AfC notification: Draft:List of books on history of number systems has a new comment
[edit]May 2025
[edit] Hello, I'm Tacyarg. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bible for children seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please avoid adjectives like "vibrant" or "comprehensive", unless you are quoting a reliable source. Thanks. Tacyarg (talk) 06:07, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: List of books on history of number systems has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
asilvering (talk) 05:03, 10 May 2025 (UTC)- thank you Kolkata.gurgaon (talk) 11:47, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 13
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gift, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Xenia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 13 May 2025 (UTC)