Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Kingh81,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Gary M. Feinman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk
I reformated a lot of your cites for the article and fixed the bare urls with titles, authots, etc., also added a few wikilinks. I also went through the rest of wikipedia and wikilinked his name back to this article, the Encyclopedia of Prehistory is pretty widely cited on here as it turns out. Cheers, Heiro19:50, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
One thing I noticed, "dual processual theory" doesn't seem to have an article, but you mention it in Peregrines article and you seem to know something about it. Processual archaeology and Post-processual archaeology have articles, have you considered starting one on this subject? I could show you how to set up a temporary working page so you could work on it without taking the article live immediately, get all of your citations in order and avoid some of the tagging, etc. you experienced with the Peter Peregrine article. Just drop me a line here or at my talkpage ( User talk:Heironymous Rowe ) if you are interested. Cheers, Heiro20:04, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, it's me, Peter. Quit messing with my entries! I noticed you've been doing a bunch of work. Is anyone else doing anything? I saw Gary edited his entry, but I haven't seen anything else. I did Mel Ember yesterday and I'm gonna do Carol this week. I have to ask Farger to add something to Rich's entry on the collective action stuff. I should have my part of his done this week. Who else should we add? Peregrip (talk) 17:02, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]