User talk:Kees Swart
This is Kees Swart's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dropquote has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:18, 13 February 2018 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Spiral puzzle has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
— Sagotreespirit (talk) 05:56, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Nomination of Frysk Puzelwurdboek for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frysk Puzelwurdboek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frysk Puzelwurdboek until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. buidhe 13:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
A belated welcome!
[edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Kees Swart! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
If you have questions,
; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Kj cheetham (talk) 22:35, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you verry much! --Kees Swart (talk) 09:47, 20 July 2025 (UTC)
July 2025
[edit] Hello, I'm Doniago, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Crossword, it appears that you added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:02, 24 July 2025 (UTC)