User talk:Justacoolshadyguy

Welcome

Hello Justacoolshadyguy and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Police corruption in Mexico, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! PamD 23:02, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

wait what did i do that was pointless on the edit? (Justacoolshadyguy (talk) 23:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC))[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Can someone please explain why I was told about acceptable edits on Wikipedia (Justacoolshadyguy (talk) 23:25, 28 March 2025 (UTC)) Justacoolshadyguy (talk) 23:25, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You should take a look at your list of contributions and check to see which have been reverted, since some reversions will happen without necessarily notifying you.

Of the ones I've looked at, it seems you are adding things that are either not needed or are changing the facts without citing a new source to substantiate the changes. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:52, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

oh thanks for checking though Justacoolshadyguy (talk) 09:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, I'm Liance. I noticed that you recently removed content from Army of Karelia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Liance^talk 22:44, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks :D Justacoolshadyguy (talk) 22:45, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary to articles, as you did at Minecraft. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to discuss the article, please use Talk:Minecraft. Thank you. GSK (talk • edits) 21:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

kk Justacoolshadyguy (talk) 21:55, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:List of Cleveland Browns seasons, you may be blocked from editing. GSK (talk • edits) 21:59, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me, how is that inappropriate? Justacoolshadyguy (talk) 22:01, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for it appears you are not able to contribute constructively at this time. Perhaps that will change in a year or two, at which time you can appeal your block.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:02, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:05, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Justacoolshadyguy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

PLEASE IM SORRY I PROMISE ON MY LIFE I WONT DO IT AGAIN PLS IM SORRY

Decline reason:

Ah ha. Yamla (talk) 22:47, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked to prevent a recurrence of this.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:12, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]