Jump to content

User talk:Johnpacklambert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of Jamal Willis for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamal Willis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamal Willis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jbt89 (talk) 18:21, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keith N. Hamilton for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keith N. Hamilton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith N. Hamilton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jbt89 (talk) 18:31, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Political activists from the Russian Empire has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. LIrala (talk) 23:37, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are illegitimate children of monarchs actually royalty

[edit]

I am wondering if illegitimate children of monarchs are actually royalty. I would think that royalty is limited to people fully recognized. So unless these people were given legitimate status after birth I would think they should be excluded from royalty categories.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:04, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:18th-century people from New Spain has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:18th-century people from New Spain has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SMasonGarrison 03:31, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:17th-century people from New Spain has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:17th-century people from New Spain has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SMasonGarrison 03:31, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Nueva Vizcaya, New Spain has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:People from Nueva Vizcaya, New Spain has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SMasonGarrison 03:36, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please add sort keys and missing parents to all the categories you made for People from New Spain SMasonGarrison 03:37, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nueva Vizcaya is part of the Philippines. Nueva Vizcaya, New Spain covered the modern Mexican states if Durango and Chihuahua, plus some adjacent areas. Nueva Vizcaya in the Philippines was created 18 years after the first place ceased yo be. They are not physically the sane place. We have a large array of categories for people by no longer extant province to cover people from that province when it did exist. This is that sort of Category. Nueva Vizcaya, New Spain was a distinct province. New Spain is a defined Viceroyalty. We likewise categorize people by the sub-units of the Russian Empire they were from and many similar things.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:00, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but that's not what I'm asking you about. Please add sort keys and missing parents to all the categories you made for People from New Spain. SMasonGarrison 21:13, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I have added the sort keys as required.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:37, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing that. Please try to remember to add them. I notice that a lot of times you forget. I've added a couple that you've missed: [ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:People_from_the_Audencia_of_Guatemala&action=history] SMasonGarrison 21:46, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]