User talk:Jessica plutman

Welcome!

Hi Jessica plutman! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nima Bagheri (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nima Bagheri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 03:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi brachy08

I'm trying to add more information about Nima Bagheri to address those in-depth issues.

I found some documents about him on https://thehackernews.com, which has over 1 million followers on various social media platforms.

For secondary sources, I'm going to search to see if I can find more information about him online.

But What do you mean the article is not independent? Jessica plutman (talk) 04:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

there isn’t enough sources and even if there is, not all of it is reliable. i’ll try to see if the hacker news is reliable brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 04:54, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UPDATE: thehackernews.com isn’t reliable. the article you cited (before they completely downsized it to only 1 writer) has lots of grammatical errors and incorrect capitalization, so there is no proofreading, so that article isn’t all that useful as a source. brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 10:35, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure but Hacker News always had 5-10 authors. Check these links:

This is from 2013

https://web.archive.org/web/20131209160517/https://thehackernews.com/p/authors.html#

This is 2025

https://thehackernews.com/p/authors.html

I did a lot of research about Nima Bagheri. The Malcon conference information is also mentioned here:

https://www.csoonline.com/article/545418/microsoft-subnet-malcon-malware-hacking-conference-for-twisted-pen-testers.html

https://www.security.nl/posting/34225/

There are other resources that have been shared about him/her/them here:

https://www.welivesecurity.com/2011/01/23/stuxnet-information-and-resources-3/

https://www.amtso.org/news/amtso-news-2024-10-30/

And his/her/their company is part of AMTSO:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Malware_Testing_Standards_Organization

https://www.amtso.org/members/ Jessica plutman (talk) 03:01, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jessica plutman! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! brachy08 _{(chat here lol)} 03:48, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nima Bagheri (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anuwrites was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Banned from numerous platforms for exposing these truths, Bagheri offers an essential perspective on Bitcoin's true origins a... Proof?

is an American cybersecurity expert, Conference Speaker and former Senior Security Researcher at DELL SonicWall What about this?

’’Stuxnet is a computer worm discovered in June 2010. It targets Siemens industrial software and equipment running Microsoft Windows. Was this necessary?

Reliabke sources are required.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nima Bagheri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ANU^writes 07:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nima Bagheri (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anuwrites was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Banned from numerous platforms for exposing these truths, Bagheri offers an essential perspective on Bitcoin's true origins a... Proof?

is an American cybersecurity expert, Conference Speaker and former Senior Security Researcher at DELL SonicWall What about this?

’’Stuxnet is a computer worm discovered in June 2010. It targets Siemens industrial software and equipment running Microsoft Windows. Was this necessary?

Reliabke sources are required.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nima Bagheri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ANU^writes 07:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Banned from numerous platforms for exposing these truths, Bagheri offers an essential perspective on Bitcoin's true origins a...

Proof?

The part I took it from his book overview at BarnesandNoble.com

Overview

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/who-is-satoshi-nakamoto-nima-bagheri/1146579779

He also posted it on his book and his blog:

https://satoshihunter1.blogspot.com/2021/09/meet-founder-of-bitcoin-adam-back-aka.html

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTrat1DFeasqJGCnK9I8jjkEwUpQMasglWQ_2hLwZWKoM0tKnLvX3vDin658TG0EwyfZ6tEPWp6Wc1Wg1uG6sPuNbN4LJIZVjkmP5FRD98ajElv4KoRM_kNS2zhK-QVOF3Paic9pj0E8mS/s1206/image029.png

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCnQSwPcCrkPOO9Dg_0a-VVbDb8LuCRRX22N3SqEvF-dRcSJZ2qwQCUM6XjeHaA1SBgilcOilqLumpu0V7HoMj18O9v01Hb6a00hs-rmXxVc8MS4OeUzs4MQy6NxQ6ZeA5XNn_LI4vTg2M/s1192/image027.png

"is an American cybersecurity expert, Conference Speaker and former Senior Security Researcher at DELL SonicWall"

What about this?

I got that form About the Author section:

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/who-is-satoshi-nakamoto-nima-bagheri/1146579779

’’Stuxnet is a computer worm discovered in June 2010. It targets Siemens industrial software and equipment running Microsoft Windows."

Was this necessary?

Correct, Removed

Feel free to add any additional information you'd like! Jessica plutman (talk) 01:20, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nima Bagheri (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement was made to the sourcing since the last decline. The only edits made since then was to delete content. Please do not resubmit a draft without addressing the issues raised in a decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nima Bagheri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 04:12, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sources are from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_Conference , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnes_%26_Noble

and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MalCon

All of these sources pass notability and are reliable. His book has a publisher, which makes it a reliable source based on Wiki Advisory. Jessica plutman (talk) 18:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Other Wikipedia pages are not valid references. Please take a look at WP:RS. SK2242 (talk) 04:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't used other Wikipedia pages. Please check out the links before rejecting the article; this is embarrassing! Jessica plutman (talk) 23:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you're saying the references are in those articles, that's not sufficient- we want the references themselves. 331dot (talk) 19:16, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nima Bagheri (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

Please stop. If you continue to resubmit drafts without addressing reviewer concerns, this draft will be rejected.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nima Bagheri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:18, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did respond to the concerns, but nobody answered back!, what else you want me to solve ? Jessica plutman (talk) 19:05, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Jessica plutman. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nedia Wanna talk? Stalk my edits 23:34, 5 February 2025 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]