User talk:Favonian
| This is Favonian's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Why does my IP address show as partially blocked?
I didn’t edit the article on the Oakland mayor. I’m using my personal cell phone and am logged onto my home WiFi. 2603:8001:B603:CBDC:D8B1:466F:7F8C:AE51 (talk) 18:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Someone with an ax to grind disrupted the article using a number of different IP addresses in the range from which you edit. The block put a stop to that, but it only affects editing of that particular article. If you wish to edit the article, your best option is to create an account. Favonian (talk) 20:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Request un-protection of article Kwebbelkop
Hello, thanksfor taking the time to read this message. I've recently created a draft (User:Dwarfroe/Kwebbelkop) of the YouTuber and AI promoter Kwebbelkop, but am unable to publish it due to the page creation being indefinitely protected in 2015. At the time, I believe he wasn't notable, but I think that he is now, a decade later. Thanks in advance. - dwarfroe (talk / contr) 20:33, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Done – @Dwarfroe: I guess the encyclopedia can always use an extra "YouTuber and AI promoter". Favonian (talk) 08:04, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
There is an edit revision box at the above article related to an edit of yours from 2012, with the only option to "unaccept" the edit. Not sure of the best approach to make it go away. Seasider53 (talk) 11:21, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure I understand what the problem is. I imposed pending changes protection on the article in 2012. If what you're looking at is the most recent change (Special:Diff/1297850768), which was done by an auto-confirmed user, hence automatically accepted, you're given the option to "unaccept it". That's probably not a good idea, so you should just navigate elsewhere. Favonian (talk) 11:48, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
I know you to be a decent sort. Any chance you could take a look at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Chocolatería San Ginés? I have engaged with the offending editor on his/her talk page and yet the bad behaviour persists. Your guidance on page protect, or whether I should take this to another forum such as WP:ANI would be very helpful. Thanks in advance. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:13, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:22, 3 July 2025 (UTC)