User talk:Ezlo Jeslan

Carti AI

Hi! Please stop disruptive editing on articles about Playboi Carti's speculated use of AI. You insist that it's a "hoax" but haven't provided any reliable source indicating such. Citing a tweet from Carti's friend is not enough. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 01:37, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

He was there at the session, which makes him a reliable source.

In addition, much of the evidence, such as the other alleged "AI references", have all been proven to be faked with no involvement from Carti's team whatsoever. It's not disruptive editing I'm doing, I'm helping to correct rampant disinformation. Ezlo Jeslan (talk) 01:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can not call it a "hoax" based on your own conclusions; a reliable source needs to call it a hoax. As I stated elsewhere, Carti's friend's Twitter is not a reliable source. Also, your claim that the alleged leaked demos "were later proven to be created by leakers with no involvement from Carti's team" is not supported by the source provided. Please stop edit warring. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 01:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Opium (record label), without citing a reliable source (which Apple music is not). Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Lil Happy Lil Sad ^:): 02:52, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How is Apple not a reliable source? It clearly shows that Nast’s new song was released via Opium.

Furthermore, YouTube data also shows it was distributed by Foundation Media, which distributed Ken and HXG’s first albums. Nast’s affiliation with ASAP Mob makes him trustworthy, and the fact that the song lists Opium as a label and was distributed by Foundation confirms it. Ezlo Jeslan (talk) 14:48, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: "Fly Me to the Moon" and Neon Genesis Evangelion (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Moritoriko was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Fly Me to the Moon. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Some of this information can be merged to the original article of this song or the article on the series soundtrack but there don't seem to be enough sources talking about this version of the song for it to get it's own article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:"Fly Me to the Moon" and Neon Genesis Evangelion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Moritoriko (talk) 03:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ezlo Jeslan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Moritoriko (talk) 03:52, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WW3 (Kanye West song) has been accepted

WW3 (Kanye West song), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 21:51, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mō Dō Natte mo Ii ya moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mō Dō Natte mo Ii ya. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GoldRomean (talk) 18:14, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to VShojo

I have warned you before about speculation and opinions in the VShojo article. Please avoid bias remarks and provide valid sources. Thank you. --WashuOtaku (talk) 18:41, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The reactions do not meet Wikipedia standards, see WP:REACTIONS. Unless they can hold-up on their own, their are just additional information that provide no value added to the article. This is the reason I removed them. It also does not help that they are backed by the social media posts and not an third-party source referencing them. Hope this helps explain the rational. --WashuOtaku (talk) 01:40, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They are, the Siliconera citations are right there. Ezlo Jeslan (talk) 01:57, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then you do not need the social media posts, that covers it. That said, I still disapprove of the reactions. --WashuOtaku (talk) 02:06, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the defunct date, I do not appreciate it when I give a good faith effort sharing my rational on why it should be left blank and simply being ignored. To avoid an edit war, I am backing down for now; but I still encourage you to share your editorial thoughts in the talk page. And please remember, we all have the same goal here. --WashuOtaku (talk) 22:32, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Be aware of the the three-revert rule. Instead of edit warring, discuss changes on the article's talk page. Do not revert any more edits at VShojo. Any further reverts will be brought up at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Grayfell (talk) 01:11, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ezlo_Jeslan reported by User:Grayfell (Result: ). Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 01:21, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:ITunes screenshot of Cuck leak.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ITunes screenshot of Cuck leak.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Xeroctic (talk) 19:36, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]