Jump to content

User talk:EncycloSphere

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, EncycloSphere, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 07:04, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Magnolia677. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hell, Magnolia677. Thanks for reviewing my recent edits. I noticed you reverted some, due to concerns about AI-generated content and sourcing. I totally get wanting to keep the article solid and well-sourced. If you could point out which parts specifically seem AI-generated or need better references, I’d be happy to improve those. I’m open to adding citations or adjusting the wording as needed. As for the AI part. even if some drafting help was used, I’m committed to making sure everything meets Wikipedia’s standards. The key thing is verifiable, reliable info, right? Per WP:LLM, content quality and sources matter more than method. Each addition was based on factual content supported either directly or indirectly by sources that are publicly accessible and consistent with Wikipedia’s content policies. Maybe we could move the discussion to the Talk page? It’d be great to get others’ input and find a solution that works for everyone.EncycloSphere (talk) 02:54, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]