User talk:Eltabar243
Hi Eltabar243! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 14:13, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi Eltabar243! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Zuṭṭ several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Zuṭṭ, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 14:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Garudam. I noticed that you recently removed content from Siege of Kampili without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Garuda Talk! 19:40, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am @AfghanParatrooper19891, I noticed you reverted content from the “Siege of Samarkhel” Wikipedia page and then removed the entire page after to make a redirect to the First Siege of Samarkhel. The Siege of Samarkhel lasted 4 months overall, there was no first or second siege. The siege started successfully for the Mujahideen, and then by June 1989 it ended and the Mujahideen did not attempt to stop it from happening after. Another user has also reverted your reverts, and you additionally seem to have a history of making random reverts for articles, which is against the rules. AfghanParatrooper19891 (talk) 16:13, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Garudam. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Battle of Kaiser-e-Hind Fortress, but the source cited did not support that content. It has been removed for now, but if you would like to include a citation that verifies the content and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Garuda Talk! 14:18, 2 February 2025 (UTC)
I think you have copied my signature style as it is. Please distinguish your signature, a little bit of copying would do but not the exact same. Best, – Garuda Talk! 22:54, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
- Also @Eltabar243, see: WP:CUSTOMSIG/P – Garuda Talk! 22:55, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Siege of Samarkhel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.– Garuda Talk! 23:30, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your good edits to Indo-Pakistani war of 1947–1948. Please could you start using edit summaries when you edit. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the Talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks! -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:16, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
When you cite sources, please can you check them. Your edit to Operation Desert Hawk cited page 77 of the 2000 edition of "A History of the Pakistan Army", which is about Operation Grand Slam.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:55, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- But i my book on the page of 77 paragraph title The Rann of Kutch conflict, probably the book sort numbers are different in our books, Operation grandslam is on 88 page number in my book. So just go back 10-20 pages on the Chapter number 3 Title (Preparations of war) in this chapters end mentions about Operation desert hawk/ kutck conflict Eltabar243 (talk) 02:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It commenced yesterday on Monday June 16 and will run until Sunday July 13. There is over $3300 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for subjects which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested. Even if you can only manage a few articles they would be very much appreciated and help make the content produced as diverse and broad as possible! Feel free to invite others who you think might want to contribute.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:21, 17 June 2025 (UTC)