User talk:Elena Jose

Welcome!

Hello, Elena Jose, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Polikarpe Jajanidze did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Adakiko (talk) 01:50, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please stop adding texts with fake references into wikipedia, such as in Daniel Siboni or in Pandit Niranjan Prasad and others. They appear to be added with the help of some AI tool. Your edits of this kind were reverted. --Altenmann >talk 06:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Do not add very long captions. --Altenmann >talk 01:35, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok, Next time I will correct the mistake Elena Jose (talk) 04:25, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sascha Fonseca image

File:Sascha Fonseca.png

Hi! Where did you get the Sascha Fonseca image from? Polygnotus (talk) 05:11, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any problem? If i made mistake in this part i will correct it next time Elena Jose (talk) 04:41, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamalesh Jagan (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kamalesh Jagan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 06:51, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elena Jose! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CoconutOctopus talk 06:51, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]