User talk:Di (they-them)/Archives/2025/February

Donald Trump and fascism

Hi Di, my name is Rollinginhisgrave. I notice you created the page for Comparisons between Donald Trump and fascism, and that the page was nominated for deleting under WP:NPOVFORK, and then kept. Reading the debate, I found it very insufficient. I didn't want to start another AfD discussion so soon after the last without engaging conversation beforehand, I hope it's okay if you're who I've engaged.

The way I have seen sources engage, whether Trump's politics are best described as fascist/fascistic is debate on one position in a broader discussion on how best to characterize his politics. This largely falls along whether it's best to describe him as fascistic vs a right wing populist. You can see an example of the literature being summarized here. For us to have an article covering the characterisation as fascist, and not one on the characterisation as a right wing populist is simply giving UNDUE weight. Generally, splitting off argumentation and positions from the broader debate context (Trumpism) is an NPOV fork. I would analogize this with the abortion debate, and how the arguments around the content of debates around pro-life and pro-choice are not split off into their own articles, but all contained within Abortion debate, to provide due context for each position.

Thanks for your time, Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 14:54, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gandalf Big Naturals.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gandalf Big Naturals.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Death Angels (A Quiet Place)

On 11 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Death Angels (A Quiet Place), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Death Angels are Happy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Death Angels (A Quiet Place). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Death Angels (A Quiet Place)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:04, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

At section Appearances the sentence

Owing to the Death Angels' powerful hearing, however, humans can speak safely in loud environments such as waterfalls that drown out their voices.

makes no sense at all. Could you maybe have meant

Owing to the Death Angels' powerful hearing, however, humans can speak safely only in loud environments such as waterfalls that drown out their voices.

Shenme (talk) 03:37, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sarah Miller-Crews

Hello, Di (they-them). This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sarah Miller-Crews, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

"Kurwa bobr" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Kurwa bobr to the article Eurasian beaver has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 17 § Kurwa bobr until a consensus is reached. 67.209.129.191 (talk) 04:48, 17 February 2025 (UTC)