User talk:CivicArchivist

Welcome to My Talk Page

Hello, and welcome to my talk page. If you have any questions, suggestions, or ideas for collaboration, feel free to leave a message below. I focus on:

- Improving article quality and structure - Verifiability, neutral tone, and reliable sources - Topics related to biographies, music, and South Asian history

Please keep in mind:

- Sign your message with four tildes: CivicArchivist (talk) 20:26, 13 June 2025 (UTC) - Keep discussions civil and constructive - I usually reply on your talk page unless you ask otherwise[reply]

Helpful Links:

Thank you for visiting. Looking forward to working together to improve Wikipedia.

— CivicArchivist

Your submission at Articles for creation: RJ Raunac (June 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GoldRomean were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RJ Raunac and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk) 02:08, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CivicArchivist! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoldRomean (talk) 02:08, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]