User talk:Cherylhwhite

Cherylhwhite, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cherylhwhite! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Shreveport Martyrs

Hello, Cherylhwhite,

Thank you for creating Shreveport Martyrs.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for writing this page! Just a few notes to improve it. Check out the general structure of other pages of saints and try to imitate them with regards to sections, formatting, etc.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Darth Stabro}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

~Darth Stabro^{Talk/Contribs} 16:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hi Cherylhwhite! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Father Jean Pierre that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk/Contribs} 16:24, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha! Thanks so much. I am learning...will remember this for future page builds. Thanks again. Cherylhwhite (talk) 16:42, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Isidore Quemerais moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Isidore Quemerais. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and the sources aren't always formatted correctly. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:14, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Gergaud moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Louis Gergaud. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and some of the sources aren't formatted correctly. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Five Priests moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Five Priests. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and some of the sources aren't formatted correctly. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:40, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing

Hello, Cherylhwhite. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 10:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Isidore Quemerais

Hello, Cherylhwhite. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Isidore Quemerais, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:07, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Five Priests

Hello, Cherylhwhite. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Five Priests, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Francois Le Vezouet

Hello, Cherylhwhite. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Francois Le Vezouet, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Five Priests (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cyberdog958 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Five Priests and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

cyberdog958^Talk 03:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis Gergaud (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are inaccessible, which makes reviewing difficult, but more importantly, are insufficiently specific. For example, "Diocese of Shreveport" is of little assistance if someone wants to verify that statement. See Help:Referencing for beginners.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Louis Gergaud and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:47, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isidore Quemerais (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Text such as "Diocese of Shreveport" is not helpful as a source. See HELP:Referencing for beginners. Also, are there accessible sources? This would make reviewing much easier, as most reviewers will be unable to access the given sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Isidore Quemerais and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jean Marie Biler (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Text such as "Diocese of Shreveport" is not helpful as a source. See HELP:Referencing for beginners. Also, are there accessible sources? This would make reviewing much easier, as most reviewers will be unable to access the given sources. Greenman

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jean Marie Biler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:03, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]