User talk:BigKrow

Welcome!

Hello, BigKrow! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started
Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Get help at the Teahouse Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions Department directory Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Task Center • Be bold in editing Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguation • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Happy editing! Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply. 22:24, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!!! BigKrow (talk) 22:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Foxwedding (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Killarnee were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Foxwedding and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Killarnee (talk) 20:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BigKrow! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Killarnee (talk) 20:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Foxwedding

Hello, BigKrow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Foxwedding, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Foxwedding

Hello, BigKrow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Foxwedding".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shawna Howson moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shawna Howson. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 01:17, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shawna Howson (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shawna Howson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 18:41, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shawna Howson

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shawna Howson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:02, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i responded on your talk page, thank you. BigKrow (talk) 19:22, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that this pesosn does not make the acceptance threshold. Regrettably you triggered the nonimnion for deletion by moving it unilaterally to mainspace. I would have sent it back to draft, but that had been done before. WP:DRAFTOBJECT forbids us to do that. Deletion was the only option left for me to propose. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:58, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tape B (music)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tape B (music) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Johnj1995 (talk) 17:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kenny Yates

Hello, BigKrow

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Adamtt9, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Kenny Yates, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Adamtt9}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Adamtt9 (talk) 19:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Claudio Jimenez moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Claudio Jimenez. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and WP:BLPs require citations as well.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:37, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Claudio Jimenez (December 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SafariScribe was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anthony Melo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anthony Melo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:00, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Caroline Botehlo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Caroline Botehlo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kevin Barrette

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kevin Barrette requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:12, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:13, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Boris the Rocket moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Boris the Rocket. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and page is poorly formatted and needs to be fixed before publishing. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:27, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:28, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Why are you publishing an article that isn't ready for main space? Please stop! CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please chill BigKrow (talk) 19:42, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boris the Rocket (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boris the Rocket and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:56, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ernst Baumhard moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ernst Baumhard. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma talk 14:09, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Boris the Rocket moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Boris the Rocket. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because the article was an AfC draft that is not ready for mainspace and prematurely moved without being reviewed.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sophisticatedevening🍷^(talk) 00:13, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. You were warned about this last month, yet you've continued to create unsourced and largely empty stubs. Consider this your last warning. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:20, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry if you think that.... BigKrow (talk) 23:38, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do apologize for the harsh warning, but I've warned you several times. Please be careful when creating new pages. I suggest creating these pages in draftspace or userspace before you decide to publish them. See Help:Userpage and Help:Userspace draft. CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:06, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carla Bernat Escuder

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Carla Bernat Escuder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Carla Bernat Escuder

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Carla Bernat Escuder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 18:54, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Carla Bernat Escuder moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Carla Bernat Escuder. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Whpq (talk) 19:14, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:02, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... BigKrow (talk) 20:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carla Bernat Escuder (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Carla Bernat Escuder and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:26, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. BigKrow (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karma: The Dark World (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Karma: The Dark World and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 20:27, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.... BigKrow (talk) 20:29, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, I'm LizardJr8. An edit that you recently made to My Eyes seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. No source, and link is to an unrelated page. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:04, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a test look it up BigKrow (talk) 21:28, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at My Eyes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:45, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are adding an unknown song, with a link to a Roman emperor. Please stop unless you have reliable sources and valid links. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:47, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nero the band lol BigKrow (talk) 22:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BigKrow, can you explain what you were trying to do in these repeated edits at My Eyes? Unless a clear explanation is forthcoming and such disruptive edits stop, your current partial block is likely to be extended to all areas of wikipedia. Abecedare (talk) 21:57, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fine BigKrow (talk) 22:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from creating new pages

BigKrow, over your short period of activity on wikipedia, you have created numerous new articles, all of which have been either draftified, redirected, or deleted. In addition, by my count, five of your AFC submissions have been declined within the last week itself. As is apparent from this record and as discussed at ANI, you are not yet well-suited to start new articles despite your good intentions.

Therefore I have blocked your ability to create new pages and upload new files for an indefinite period. If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} Abecedare (talk) 21:36, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't indefinitely block me I call foul play BigKrow (talk) 21:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abecedare: BigKrow (talk) 21:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BigKrow, note that you are still allowed and able to edit existing articles. And you can ask for the ability to create new pages to be restored once you have demonstrated that you can comply with wikipedia's notability, sourcing, WP:BLP and other relevant guidelines. If you still disagree with this partial block, you can post an appeal as outlined in the above block notice. Abecedare (talk) 21:45, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me BigKrow (talk) 22:17, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are only blocked from creating articles, you can still edit any article. Lavalizard101 (talk) 22:28, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok BigKrow (talk) 22:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Hello, I'm Sarsenet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Paul Jewell, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 01:43, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello BigKrow! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Rowing in Scotland, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 00:51, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BigKrow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

sorry BigKrow (talk) 01:07, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

When you appeal your block, you are asking for an independent admin to come and review it. When I get here, I'm looking for some explanation as to why you think the block was incorrectly imposed, and/or why it is no longer necessary. And all I see is "sorry". I'm not sure what you expect me to do with that, other than to decline this as completely insufficient. In any case, you've been blocked for barely a day, just sit it out and think about what led to this block and what you need to do differently to avoid further blocks going forward. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ivanvector BigKrow (talk) 01:07, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BigKrow, you will be able and welcome to edit existing articles (such as 2025 Boulder fire attack) once your 31 hour block expires but, for reasons explained above, you will continue to be blocked from creating new pages. If you try to circumvent the latter limit by creating new accounts, as you attempted with FascinatingStreet, you are likely to lose your editing privileges on wikipedia altogether. Abecedare (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]