User talk:Bgrus22

IMDb, reliable sources, and user reviews

Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted your recent edit to The Dentist. The IMDb is a not reliable source, and its contents should not be imported into Wikipedia. It's written by random people, who sometimes make up hoaxes when they're bored, much like Wikipedia. For this reason, we require citations to be to sources that are not user-generated. Usually, this means articles written by professional journalists or academics in a source that has editorial control – for example, Variety or the Los Angeles Times, which often cover American films. Second, per MOS:FILM#Audience response, we don't user reviews. They are subject to vote stacking and brigading. Instead, we use professional services, such as CinemaScore or PostTrak. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

it says on wiki that user reviews are acceptable as long as they are identified as user reviewsBgrus22 (talk) 10:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Brownies for you! Hope you like em

In recognition of high-quality editing on current events often extremely politically-charged and difficult to manage by all but the greatest editors. Fvoltes (talk) 01:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 12:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: hope youre doing well, long time no see! thanks for letting me know right now I am working on a few pages ranging from a footballer to Italian politicians. Hope thats all fine a' okay. Bgrus22 (talk) 01:19, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Bgrus22. Thank you for your work on Hava Inbar. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

@SunDawn: Thank you for taking the time to write this message, it is very much appreciated. I didn't realize there were other G-d fearing folks here editing on the site. I hope you stay well and safe in these trying times! Feel free to send me a message if you ever need a hand with something or to get any pages started. Oh and your page is amazing, I may be stealing some tags you have that I didn't know about :) . Bgrus22 (talk) 17:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Bgrus22, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 00:32, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Bgrus22 (talk) 01:05, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Nice work on creating new articles. Andre🚐 08:27, 6 May 2025 (UTC)