User talk:Benjamin Chongloi

February 2025

Your edit to User:Benjamin Chongloi/sandbox has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Bbb23 (talk) 20:13, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Stop. You were already informed that you cannot copy text from other websites. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing to prevent further disruption. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 22:56, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

No, I wasn't informed I couldn't copy from other websites, I had to make available the info provided on the website on the wiki page I didn't know, i wasn't literally allowed to copy paste, otherwise I would have wrote it in a different way, if I had known. Benjamin Chongloi (talk) 01:43, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Thangkholun Lhungdim (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

• Draft:Daniel Thangkholun Lhungdim may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 22:54, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Benjamin Chongloi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 22:54, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

the previous copyright strike was about the picture. it had nothing to do with the text. so please give me another chance on this platform, I'll make sure to go through everything before sending for review next time. Benjamin Chongloi (talk) 01:44, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

February 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 23:41, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Benjamin Chongloi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please, I wasn't aware that we are prohibited from copy pasting from other sites, I thought as long as the page owner gave permission to copy paste we were allowed to do so, but it doesn't seem to be the case, if I had known I would have wrote in in another way without copy pasting. and also this is the first time I am getting warning for copy pasting the texts the previous one was for the photo(which the owner did give permission). Since I am really unaware and new to the platform please do give me another chance, I'll make sure to go through everything before sending the next one for review. please do give another chance Benjamin Chongloi (talk) 01:51, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Accept reason:

You've acknowledged your mistake and committed to not making it again. voorts (talk/contributions) 02:30, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

What is your relationship with Mr. Lhungdim? 331dot (talk) 08:32, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Please also show where the owner of the website specifically permitted pasting content from their site. You also falsely claim the initial problem was only the image. This is factually accurate. --Yamla (talk) 11:52, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

@Yamla: This is factually accurate. Didn't you mean "inaccurate"? Also, the user was aware of the copyright issue before he created the draft. I deleted the sandbox per G12 and warned him after doing so.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Yeap, inaccurate. Sorry. You'd think it would be hard to type the exact opposite of what you mean, but I manage to do so frequently. --Yamla (talk) 17:12, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Tbh, I wasnt aware of the copyright issue, i thought it was only on the photo, that's why I didn't include the photo in the new article that i submitted. And as for proof of me having the copyright to the article, I was asked by our community rabbi(who is also the owner of the website shivtei menashe), to publish the article on Wikipedia since Mr.Lhungdim played an important part in our history as the tribe of Bnei Menashe.but yes i accept all this is as a result of me being not aware of the rules and regulations of wikipedia, so please give me another chance i'll be extra careful next time. Benjamin Chongloi (talk) 16:56, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

The rule is that you cannot post copyrighted material on Wikipedia - even if you are the copyright holder, or have the copyright holder's permission - unless the material has been explicitly released for use by the verified copyright owner into the public domain or under a license compatible with Wikipedia. These licenses allow anyone — not just Wikipedia — to share, distribute, transmit, and adapt the work, free of charge and in perpetuity, provided that the original author is attributed. Also, because some derivative works may be commercial, we cannot accept materials that are licensed only for educational use or even for general non-commercial use. Releasing the material is both permanent and irrevocable. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:17, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Okay thank you for clearifying, I wasn't aware of that, I had published two article from sand box one had a copyright warning on the photo, so i thought it is because of the photo i got the copyright warning so, I deleted the photo and published the 2nd article without any photo. that's where i got my account blocked. Now that I know the rules a bit, I'll look into more of the rules before publishing the next article if I do get unblocked, and make sure it won't happen again. So please someone do unblock me. Benjamin Chongloi (talk) 14:42, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Your unblock request is in the queue of unblock requests, and will be reviewed whenever an administrator has time. Like all other Wikipedia users, administrators are volunteers, so no one can guarantee how quickly it will be evaluated. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

ok thank you for the information. that was helpful. hopefully I'll get unblocked soon. Benjamin Chongloi (talk) 15:06, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

@Bbb23: Any objections to an unblock here? voorts (talk/contributions) 01:10, 26 February 2025 (UTC)