User talk:Anpanman11

First Timurid war of succession moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, First Timurid war of succession, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:53, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mughal–Maratha Wars

That war ended with Victory of Marathas.please give them respect at least what they achieved. 49.36.41.113 (talk) 12:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you recently removed content from Mughal–Maratha Wars without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 331dot (talk) 12:22, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mughal–Maratha Wars, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 09:08, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm MBlaze Lightning. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Battle of Chamb, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MBlaze Lightning (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 1947 Poonch rebellion, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:First Timurid war of succession

Hello, Shah Bayg Khan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Timurid war of succession, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:First Timurid war of succession

Hello, Shah Bayg Khan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "First Timurid war of succession".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:02, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muslim Gujjars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muslim Gujjars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Poonch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muslim Gujjars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chechi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:12, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muslim Gujjars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chauhan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ruhullah Khan of Poonch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ghazi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:05, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muslim Gujjars, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Swat and Poonch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

Hello, I'm Sybercracker. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Muslim Gujjars in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sybercracker (talk) 14:00, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes, I removed those edits related to religion and gallery as I deemed them irrelevant as we're already talking about a specific ethno-religious group. Anpanman11 (talk) 14:12, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Anpanman11 No you can not removed well sourced content from Inbox and culture related sections or other parts of the content with misleading edit-summaries (like you purposely removed population estimates from infobox when information was well sourced). These all edits were made by myself not an IP so please don't remove next time with misleading/wrong edit summaries. Before removal ping me on article talk page and gain consensus for the removal thank you. Sybercracker (talk) 14:18, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Galleries are related to the subject how any gallery images is not suitable? if you want to remove next time discuss first on article talk page and attain consensus. Also religion section is related to their historical conversation from ancient religion to Hinduism then to Islam.Sybercracker (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

their conversion has already been discussed in the history section, there's no need for a religion section Anpanman11 (talk) 14:25, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, in history section only is mentioned about their conversion from Hinduism to Islam in 11th century but there were no mentions of that Pakistani Gujjars were the Sun-Worshipers before their conversion to Hinduism. That's why I added a separate section.Sybercracker (talk) 14:38, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

just because you sourced your edit, it doesn't make your edit reliable. You really think there are 30 million Muslim Gujjars in Pakistan? That they're 20% of its population? I've been working on this tribe for quite a long time, I've all the demographic data & history related excerpts from well established sources. Anpanman11 (talk) 14:23, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First of all it doesn't matter what I think or not. What recently published sources said only matters. My edit is reliable or not discuss on article talk page get consensus that's the only way to colloborate with other editors on Wikipedia. If do you have any recently published reliable sources that said their population is different in numbers you can cite such sources also, but you can not remove sources those I cited because this doesn't even make a sense you need to clarify how sources I've cited are not reliable regarding their population estimates before such removal in future. Sybercracker (talk) 14:34, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Favonian [1] please check this user is edit waring here. I've also initiated a conversation on the article talk page he is not in the mood to listen anyone. Sybercracker (talk) 14:54, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Fazal Ali Khan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ~ lovkal (talk) 18:58, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:56, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Anpanman11! Your additions to Muslim Gujjars have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 09:06, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chaudhri Sultan Ali moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chaudhri Sultan Ali. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:15, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Chaudhri Sultan Ali

Hello @Anpanman11 do you have any other sources to add on this article.Sybercracker (talk) 19:56, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fazal Ali Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fazal Ali Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fazal Ali Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sybercracker (talk) 15:11, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1. Stop following me

2. There are multiple sources already for this page

3. Fazal Ali Khan is a renowned figure in Pakistani politics

4. More sources will be added later on

5. You can't delete a page Anpanman11 (talk) 18:00, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can not delete any page as I'm not an admin here. You can add more sources then any admin will restore the page back without any deletion, I believe you also used AI model to write this article. Sybercracker (talk) 19:18, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then why did you nominate the page for deletion when you knew nothing about it? How can you say I used AI? Anpanman11 (talk) 08:05, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Please see this Anpanman11. Sybercracker (talk) 22:04, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, Anpanman11, this notice is to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at the Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard regarding possible behavior violations within a designated contentious topic. The thread is titled Anpanman11. ~ Jenson (SilverLocust 💬) 09:41, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note At WP:AE, please place your comments in your own section, and do not write in other's sections. I have had to move your comments twice now. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 15:11, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]