User talk:61.101.80.201

June 2025

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:28, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61.101.80.201 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't seem to understand why I have been blocked. It says "block evasion" but this is my first time writing here. 61.101.80.201 (talk) 03:40, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

IP addresses can be shared amongst other people, in many ways. If you know nothing about this, please request an account via WP:ACC so that your edits are your own and you arenn't affected by blocks caused by others. You may also wait out the block. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61.101.80.201 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my first time writing on Wikipedia. Any administrator is free to investigate this IP address. I read that something called Checkuser? can be used? To check? 61.101.80.201 (talk) 12:04, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This IP address was used to evade a block. If that wasn't you, please request an account via WP:ACC. No other investigation needs to be done; checkusers do not use their tools on request. 331dot (talk) 16:33, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61.101.80.201 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are mistaken. What IP did evade the block? I would want to create an account but the community doesn't feel very welcoming to be honest. On what grounds? Any evidence? 61.101.80.201 (talk) 16:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Hi IP, I've had a look and asked the blocking admin, and I do agree that your questions strongly resemble those by another recently blocked editor. Because IPs can change frequently, it's possible that you never knew you were blocked in the first place. Once this block expires, I strongly suggest creating an account so this doesn't happen to you in the future. -- asilvering (talk) 17:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

61.101.80.201 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I frequently read Wikipedia and I did see similar topics popping up throughout the years on the same talk pages (when I go back in the extensive archive there), so it's nothing new. I can assure you, I haven't been writing here for over ten years. It seems to be a pattern there to shut down all kind of discussions if it gets uncomfortable so I just wanted to jump in to improve the articles but was blocked very quickly and my answers were removed. Many misleading references in those articles and apparently anyone trying to correct it gets blocked rather quickly. 61.101.80.201 (talk) 17:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I frequently read Wikipedia and I did see similar topics popping up throughout the years on the same talk pages (when I go back in the extensive archive there), so it's nothing new. I can assure you, I haven't been writing here for over ten years. It seems to be a pattern there to shut down all kind of discussions if it gets uncomfortable so I just wanted to jump in to improve the articles but was blocked very quickly and my answers were removed. Many misleading references in those articles and apparently anyone trying to correct it gets blocked rather quickly.     [[Special:Contributions/61.101.80.201|61.101.80.201]] ([[User talk:61.101.80.201#top|talk]]) 17:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I frequently read Wikipedia and I did see similar topics popping up throughout the years on the same talk pages (when I go back in the extensive archive there), so it's nothing new. I can assure you, I haven't been writing here for over ten years. It seems to be a pattern there to shut down all kind of discussions if it gets uncomfortable so I just wanted to jump in to improve the articles but was blocked very quickly and my answers were removed. Many misleading references in those articles and apparently anyone trying to correct it gets blocked rather quickly.     [[Special:Contributions/61.101.80.201|61.101.80.201]] ([[User talk:61.101.80.201#top|talk]]) 17:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I frequently read Wikipedia and I did see similar topics popping up throughout the years on the same talk pages (when I go back in the extensive archive there), so it's nothing new. I can assure you, I haven't been writing here for over ten years. It seems to be a pattern there to shut down all kind of discussions if it gets uncomfortable so I just wanted to jump in to improve the articles but was blocked very quickly and my answers were removed. Many misleading references in those articles and apparently anyone trying to correct it gets blocked rather quickly.     [[Special:Contributions/61.101.80.201|61.101.80.201]] ([[User talk:61.101.80.201#top|talk]]) 17:42, 7 June 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Is there a particular reason you are not availing yourself of WP:ACC? 331dot (talk) 17:57, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well, just because I don't plan to be active every week, just maybe once a month or so, to change some small things when I see something that needs correction, so I don't think it is needed. And there should be no problem to edit without an account either. There shouldn't be a difference.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.