Jump to content

User talk:47.157.117.95

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 47.157.117.95! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:41, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

[edit]

Please do not submit other people's sandboxes for AfC review. It is the unfinished work and/or testing of other editors, and is not meant for mainspace. Repeatedly submitting as you have been doing is disruptive and spams the queue of submissions. If you would like to submit a draft please use your own sandbox or draft with your own work. Thank you. Sophisticatedevening🍷(talk) 19:02, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Information icon Hello, I'm ClaudineChionh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 04:44, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Thomas Dunn (lieutenant-governor). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 04:51, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Monzo. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 04:54, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Province of Quebec (1763–1791), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Knitsey (talk) 20:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.