Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Tongu do dia toinges mo thúath

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 13:04, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Tongu do dia toinges mo thúath

  • Source: First scholar: Ó hUiginn 1989, p. 340: "Far from reflecting an inherited pre-christian archaism, it has every appearance of being a contrived learned phrase, and like the later formulae it can be regarded as the creation of archaizing christian literati. "
Second scholar: Watkins 1990, p. 52: ""I suggest that in the three specifications of 'one's own god(s),' [...] we have not only a primary syntactic comparandum but the material for reconstructing an inherited Indo-European oath formulation, the 'greatest local oath.'"
Created by Tenpop421 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 10 past nominations.

Tenpop421 (talk) 15:43, 26 February 2025 (UTC).

  • Article is new enough and long enough, no copyvio, well-sourced. Hook is good (taking the quoted Ó hUiginn source on faith). QPQ done. I do think the bold text in the hook should say "one Old Irish oath" or "a certain Old Irish oath". Srnec (talk) 16:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
ALT0b: ... that while one scholar regards a certain Old Irish oath as a scholarly Christian invention, another regards it as the descendent of a proto-Indo-European oath?