The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by JuniperChilltalk 13:16, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Overall: The article is new enough and long enough. It is sourced throughout, and the hook is properly cited, both in this submission and in the article. It seems neutral and Earwig's copyvio tool indicates that it is likely free of plagiarism. The hook is interesting. QPQ has been satisfied. Overall, I see no reason not to approve this submission. JJonahJackalope (talk) 20:50, 2 July 2025 (UTC)