Template:Did you know nominations/Pope Donus II
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by History6042 talk 12:11, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Pope Donus II
- ... that despite being praised for his honorable conduct by later historians, Pope Donus II (pictured) never existed?
- Source: "DONUS II. A man "never charged with any injustice or dishonourable action." from https://archive.org/details/bishopsoflindisf00mileiala/page/298/mode/2up?q=%22Donus+II%22
"Attention must now be called to the fact that no Pope of the name of Domnus (or Donus II.) had any existence at this time,"
from https://archive.org/details/popesearlymid04mannuoft/page/312/mode/2up?q=%22Donus+II%22- ALT1: ... that Pope Donus II (pictured) never existed? Source: "Attention must now be called to the fact that no Pope of the name of Domnus (or Donus II.) had any existence at this time," from https://archive.org/details/popesearlymid04mannuoft/page/312/mode/2up?q=%22Donus+II%22
- ALT2: ... that papal historians accidently created Pope Donus II (pictured)? Source: Full context on page 313 https://archive.org/details/popesearlymid04mannuoft/page/312/mode/2up?q=%22Donus+II%22
- Reviewed:
5x expanded by GGOTCC (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
GGOTCC 01:24, 29 April 2025 (UTC).
Newly expanded to slightly over 5X the stub, no copyright/close paraphrasing issues; well-sourced, neutrally voiced, presentable; very interesting even as a footnote, with hooks cited to good scholarly sources; image is public domain
(the license should be completed with a PD art one, since the original image is from the Renaissance), but not exactly high quality (also consider uploading this alternative).No QPQ required from nominator. This article is a nice break from all the trite promotional articles about vapid and terminally online celebrities. Dahn (talk) 05:50, 29 April 2025 (UTC)