Talk:Uni Abex

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 May 2025. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... "Being Indian" is not a valid reason for deletion of corporate articles. This is a brand-new article and although the standard of sourcing is poor as yet, that's no reason for deletion (and specifically noted at A7). The company itself is established over 50 years and has a large market cap. That's enough reason to keep the article as yet.

If anyone wants to AfD it on the basis of writing quality or sourcing, then that's another question. But this isn't a speedy deletion. --Andy Dingley (talk) 10:43, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Dingley: That's fair, I don't think I said anything about the company being Indian, but I may need to recalibrate my A7/NCORP meter more generally. In any case someone else has started an AfD, in case you haven’t seen that yet. — ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 12:00, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]