Talk:Stuttgart kitchen
Appearance
Did you know nomination
[edit]
( )
- ... that the Munich and Stuttgart kitchens (pictured) took different approaches to managing children and bad smells?
- Source: "It consisted of ... a moveable glass partition ... preventing the transmission of smells when this was necessary. Compared with the isolated kitchen of Frankfurt, and the Stuttgart model with its serving hatch, the moveable glass wall ... created a visual relationship with the dining room, so that children could be minded while one cooked." (Garrido, p. 156)
- ALT1: ... that the Munich kitchen was developed because the Stuttgart kitchen (pictured) did not allow the housewife to look after her children? Source: (Garrido, p. 156)
- ALT2: ... that the Munich and Stuttgart kitchens (pictured) took different approaches to managing children and cooking odors—one using a glass wall, the other a serving hatch? Source: (Garrido, p. 156)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/George Arthur Lincoln, Template:Did you know nominations/Men in This Town
- Comment: The original hook might be the most fun one, but the other two are not bad either, I think :)
Surtsicna (talk) 22:13, 26 July 2025 (UTC).
Doing... ミラP@Miraclepine 01:28, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Other problems:
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- I did not find the German names of Munich kitchen (Münchener Küche), Stuttgart small kitchen (Stuttgarter Kleinküche), and Stuttgart teaching kitchen (Stuttgarter Lehrküche) in the referenced sources, though they should be easy to find otherwise. Everything else has been verified.
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Both articles were created on nom day and sized at 1959 B (Munich) and 2194 B (Stuttgart). Image is PD in the US. Prefer ALT1 over ALT0/2 because cause-and-effect double hooks are more exceptional than differences (and also the parenthesis is placed in an ambiguous way). @Surtsicna: fix the issue and you're good to go; the names should be easy to find in RS. ミラP@Miraclepine 02:10, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- Sources added. Thank you for the detailed review, Miraclepine! Surtsicna (talk) 19:06, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- Checked them;
they check out! ミラP@Miraclepine 19:54, 4 August 2025 (UTC)
- Checked them;
- Sources added. Thank you for the detailed review, Miraclepine! Surtsicna (talk) 19:06, 4 August 2025 (UTC)