This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report7 times. The weeks in which this happened:
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template. Please read the prior discussions touching on this issue above this section and in the talk page archives before reposting. Thanks. DrKay (talk) 12:23, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The original comment makes no sense: she is the Queen precisely because she is a queen consort. They are not separate things. As the name suggests, she is a queen by virtue of being a consort. The same applied to all queen consorts in English royal history, without exception. The same will apply to Catherine too. Similarly, Elizabeth II was the Queen because she was a queen regnant. It would be outrageous to say "Elizabeth was not the Queen; she was the queen regnant" as if they're distinct things. It's like saying "I don't have a car; I have a red car", as if the descriptor "red" somehow made the thing distinct from being a car.--Vabadus91 (talk) 18:21, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"change Queen Camilla to Queen Consort Camilla". All references to "Queen Camilla" in this Wikipedia article should be corrected to "Queen Consort Camilla" because Camilla it is incorrect to refer to a Queen Consort as the Queen of England. Camilla's title was intentionally granted and limited by Queen Elizabeth of England, shortly before her passing, to "Queen Consort", which is a lower rank than "Queen". To call Camilla "Queen" and not "Queen Consort" is an egregious insult to the status of a "Queen" and to the specific intention of the late Queen Elizabeth of England. It's as incorrect as calling a Vice President of the United States as the President of the United States. Surely Wikipedia does not wish to distort reality by using the incorrect royal title in this entry. 2604:2D80:D689:1200:B447:BD4D:D7F8:A3A (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This argument is incredibly tiresome now. As the consort to the king, Camilla is Queen, with consort indicating what type of Queen she is. Elizabeth II was Queen as she was sovereign, a queen regnant. Camilla is Queen because she is the kings consort. Queen Elizabeth did not bestow anything on Camilla. Just like her mother, and her grandmother, and her great grandmother etc, they were all consorts, and addresses as "Queen [Name]. When Elizabeth states it was her sincerest wish for Camilla to be recognised as Queen Consort - she did not stipulate she wished her title to be "Camilla, Queen Consort". Please refer to all royal consorts in the British lineage and please educate yourself. 92.21.157.113 (talk) 16:23, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the 