This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world
but they do not seem to have been sex workers — what exactly made them "seem" to not be sex workers? In other parts of the text it's said that they were sexually available to their patrons.
It seems that for the first century or so in al-Andalus, qiyān were brought west after being trained in Medina or Baghdad, or were trained by artists from the east. It seems that by the 11th century, with the collapse of the Caliphate of Córdoba, qiyān tended to be trained in Córdoba rather than imported after training. It seems that while female singers still existed, enslaved ones were no longer found in al-Andalus in the 14th century CE. — three sentences in a row starting with the same phrasing. This is also a rather unusual choice of words. Why does it seem like that and to whom does it seem like that? Is that the opinion of a single researcher? If so, that researcher should be named.
I see that these phrasings originate with me. I agree that the repetition is ugly and is could be copy-edited! The underlying issue is that in both cases where I used the word 'seem', the historical evidence is limited, so although historians have a rough idea about what was happening and at what dates, it's hard to be sure.
A slave who is sexually available to their owner isn't a sex worker, in that they don't exchange their labour for payment. We don't have clear evidence that qiyān were sex workers -- but our evidence isn't good enough to say categorically that qiyān were never sex-workers.
Likewise, we don't know enough about the Andalusi situation to be certain of what was happening -- we can just make informed guesses based on the evidence available. Copy-editing to remove that triple repetition of 'seem' would be good though! Alarichall (talk) 08:03, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]