This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
At one place, the article says, "The win was Gukesh's first against Carlsen in classical, and saw him climb to third place in the standings, a point behind Carlsen and Nakamura". This is not the final tally indicates. Instead, it should say, "1.5 points behind Carlsen and 1 point behind Caruana". Kindly advise. Neotaruntius (talk) 07:52, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That sentence isn't incorrect; it indicates the standings after the sixth round and Gukesh's win over Carlsen. The summary section is currently incomplete, but I intend to add the last four rounds as soon as I find time. I'll add an update tag for now; others are welcome to help and contribute. 9ninety (talk) 16:26, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@9ninety. I suspected something like this; hence the query on talk page. I imagine, it is alright to mention the standings after each round [because it is okay to keep the scores after sixth round]? Kindly advise. As you must have understood, I am just trying to learn the ropes. Thanks very much. Neotaruntius (talk) 06:01, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
