Talk:Naga Army

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Naga Army article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Naga Army. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Naga Army at the Reference desk.

India Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Myanmar Low‑importance

Naga Army is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet, requested articles on Burmese subjects and articles on smaller towns and villages
Expand : Top-importance and High-importance articles
Photo : add photos of incumbent politicians
Stubs : Category:Myanmar stubs
Update : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet after 2015 election
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also

Military history: Asian / Indian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Concocted topic?

The term "Naga Army" has been used by various Naga separatist organisations for their militant wings. But there is no evidence that it is an organisation in itself that has persisted through all these decades. This seems to be a concocted topic based on a name. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 00:35, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Political party vs military organisation

Mistaking "militant" and "military" is unhelpful. It is an obstacle to have clear ideas about the subject. For example: Kachin Independence Organisation vs Kachin Independence Army. Xufanc (talk) 08:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The word "militant" isn't on the main page. So I don't know what you are talking about.

WP:OSE is not a valid argument for notability issues. It all depends on the context, and how the subjects are covered in WP:RS. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is military wings, not "militant wings" as you wrote.Xufanc (talk) 11:08, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]