Talk:Monopoly video games

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Ben 10: Omniverse 2 (2 participants)
Beyond Software (3 participants)
Vulcan Software (2 participants)
PomPom Games (1 participant)
Pirate Software (19 participants)
Parroty Interactive (3 participants)
Razorworks (2 participants)
Jim Rossignol (3 participants)
Kuju (company) (5 participants)
Rabbid Peach (9 participants)
GXCW (3 participants)
Paragon Studios (3 participants)
Hidari (illustrator) (3 participants)
Toi8 (3 participants)
Shanghai Mini (3 participants)
Noise Factory (3 participants)
Physics Abstraction Layer (1 participant)
Edelweiss (visual novel) (8 participants; relisted)
Illuvium (company) (1 participant; relisted)
Maciej Frączyk (2 participants; relisted)
Parsoft Interactive (2 participants; relisted)
Point of View (company) (4 participants; relisted)
Circus (company) (4 participants; relisted)
Conflict (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
Project Moon (3 participants; relisted)
Brace Yourself Games (4 participants; relisted)
BitComposer Interactive (4 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Revisions

I don't like how the last paragraph is written. Someone please fix it. Shrumster 20:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed section completely, because it's not noteworthy. Whoever keeps adding it back, cut it out. It's an advertisement. If you're going to add that section, add information on the other versions before it. Zapzupnz (talk) 12:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

???

This page is one of the worst I have seen on Wikipedia.

Why is the newest version included in this page and not given it's own page?

Can I start the requested page?

JackRendar (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Compfusing

Each release of the game should have its own subsection, briefly describing how it differs from the others, and what machines it runs on. 2fort5r (talk) 17:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

full list of monopoly games

This page could benefit from having a complete list of games with release dates and platforms — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.28.83.180 (talk) 12:30, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 April 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. We have a rough consensus that this is a better title, and has substantial precedent. Cúchullain ^t/c 20:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Monopoly (video games) → Monopoly video games – or List of Monopoly video games. Either one would avoid an awkward disambiguator that gives the appearance of a (proscribed) incomplete-disambiguation page and would follow established naming structures at Category:Video games based on toys. --Relisted. George Ho away from home (talk) 20:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC) --BDD (talk) 15:22, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment each game is, as far as I can see, simply called "Monopoly" so I think there is awkwardness whatever is done. All the same I think there is a presedent for the move as per site:en.wikipedia.org/ "video games". Greg Kaye 18:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose initial proposal This uses "monopoly" as a descriptor, instead of it being about the board game, and there are many "monopoly" video games that are not concerned with the board game Monopoly. Therefore, prefer [[List of Monopoly video games]] as it indicates through capitalization that this is not "monopoly" but is "Monopoly" -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:31, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your suggestion is not without merit, though if the page were moved as proposed, the displaytitle would make the scope clear; it would appear as "Monopoly video games". Still, I would contest the assertion that "there are many 'monopoly' video games that are not concerned with the board game". What exactly is a "monopoly video game"? --BDD (talk) 13:57, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

monopoly is dominance and control of a market segment or resource. There are many games which sets win conditions as the dominance and control of a market segment or resource. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support any title without a disambiguator that can properly define the subject. The current structure of the title could make the reader initially believe that the article is about the term "monopoly" in video games. Steel1943 (talk) 18:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Monopoly: City Streets

As far as I recall (I have been playing it myself for quite a while), the wording like “For several months in 2009, Google Maps hosted an online version of Monopoly, using its maps as the board” is quite incorrect: it hasn’t been “hosted by Google Maps” (implying it was produced/implemented by Google), but basically launched by Hasbro (or some of its production teams), and just used the Google Maps (and OpenStreetMaps altogether) through the public official APIs (as everybody can do, and make their own clone or similar game). Google Maps were used to provide the “gaming board”, draw the city of the game; on top of the city, the lines and the roads were superimposed according to the information taken from the OSM (street geometry, street length – the latter was rather important as depending on the length, the number of possible properties on this street varied). As the visuals were taken from one and the street structure taken from another service, it sometimes caused minor (and sometimes more major) inconsistencies as the could be slightly mismatched. But as a summary, my understanding is it was made by (Hasbro-related) third party. Honeyman (talk) 11:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Popular mobile game

Can Monopoly Go be included? MarioX974 (talk) 21:07, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Monopoly GO spam

If you are wondering about its growth, it is spamming Telegram, IRC and Matrix nowadays with its download links. bkil (talk) 17:00, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 July 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Monopoly video games. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 22:32, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Monopoly in video games → Monopoly (video game series) – The current title makes it sound like it's about financial monopolies by companies in video games. The proposed title follows series naming guidelines. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:33, 14 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 04:56, 22 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. – MrAussieGuy (Talk) 09:50, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced this is a series, so I prefer Monopoly video games or Video game adaptations of Monopoly or Video games based on Monopoly, perhaps prefixed with "List of". Jruderman (talk) 03:23, 15 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Prefer alternatives suggested by Jruderman although I'm also not sure the current title is that bad. Monopoly video games is most concise. Agree this is not a "series". It was moved from that title to Monopoly (video game genre) and then later that same day to the current title in August 2022. --MYCETEAE 🍄‍🟫—talk 22:42, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Board and table games and WikiProject Video games have been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 04:56, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I like Monopoly video games. It's not really a series. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 05:30, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - The article in fact was at Monopoly video games until just a couple years ago, with that name supported by a move discussion seen farther up on this talk page. I prefer Jruderman's suggestion of Video game adaptations of Monopoly, but I can get behind "Monopoly video games" as well. The problem with this proposal is that, as others have said, the subject is really a set of video games using the same licensed IP rather than a video game series.--Martin IIIa (talk) 02:11, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Move back to Monopoly video games. The current title was undiscussed and is inappropriate. oknazevad (talk) 22:26, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.