Jump to content

Talk:Matt Koart/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 21:25, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 16:15, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:15, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

[edit]
  • an executive in the real estate business-->an executive in a real estate business
    • He was an executive for multiple companies, though? Saying just "a real estate business" doesn't sound right. Thoughts?
  • two-way could be linked to two-way player
    • Done.
  • Koart redshirted in 1981, then lettered for the-->Koart redshirted in 1981; he then lettered for the
    • Done.
  • Koart was the recipient-->He was the recipient
    • Done.
  • References:
    • All appear appropriate for what is being cited
    • All are consistently formatted
    • Spot checks: 3, 5, 7, 8, 13, 14, 17, 19

Good job, not much needed! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:01, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.