Talk:Makabayan

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Socialism Mid‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Factions

@Vif12vf: How is it not homogeneous? Because AFAIK, they are pretty much united on social issues. I haven't found any source in which they are divided. I live in the Philippines and watch and read news everyday, and I always pay attention when it's about Makabayan. And so far, I haven't heard about a Makabayan representative who dissented against the majority of their organization. pandakekok9 (talk) 03:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that you being pinoy does not matter here, because you are not allowed to use yourself as a source. The thing about the ideology-section is that when i made it i had to base it off of what information has about the different party-lists, in which case only progressivism and left-wing nationalism appears among multiple lists. The rest only appears in the article of the party-lists who focuses on specifically on these issues. If the entire coalition shares all of these focuses and more that we don't already have, you have to find reliable third-party sources and preferably add them to the articles of the relevant party-lists. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 13:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Party-lists

if i calculated it correctly it should be (going by Kabataan, GABRIELLA, ACT, Bayan Muna & Anakpawis):

2022: 1592394 (4.33%)
2019: 2304518 (8.27%)
2016: 3822909 (11.76%)
2013: 2787357 (10.06%)
2010: 2995732 (9.96%)

@Bertotits23 and Rizalninoynapoleon: Braganza (talk) 08:17, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

with PISTON it is

2016: 3912293 (12.04%)
2013: 2962333 (10.69%)

Braganza (talk) 09:31, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this should now be correct with Akap Bata, Migrante & Katribu Braganza (talk) 09:46, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]