Talk:Jianye Building

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Lzk15038863666 (talk) 15:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lzk15038863666 You forgot your argument. Also, please follow our instructions: When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, you should make it clear your work is a translation. Read more about this requirement here: WP:TFOLWP . Please add the following template to the article's talk page Template:Translated page (if the translation is to English) _{Piotrus at Hanyang| reply here} 00:58, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That said, I will contest this speedy. The linked Jianye Building | Earwig's Copyvio Detector report gives me a whooping 0.0% similarity - not just because our article is in English, and the source page is in Chinese; I rerun the check with zh article: 建業大廈 | Earwig's Copyvio Detector and got the same 0%. So what's the problem? _{Piotrus at Hanyang| reply here} 01:00, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]