This article was nominated for deletion on 24 April 2025. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Hello Wikipedia editors,
I am writing to formally raise serious concerns regarding a biography that has appeared on Wikipedia under my name. I have credible video evidence that a group of individuals intentionally and maliciously conspired to create this page with the intent to damage my personal and professional reputation.
The content violates Wikipedia’s Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) policy, including the principles of neutrality, verifiability, and protection against libel. Additionally, I believe it fails the notability standard and may have been created with clear conflict of interest and malicious intent.
I respectfully request that this article be reviewed for potential speedy deletion and ask for guidance on submitting further evidence directly and privately to the appropriate channels.
I am happy to provide the video documentation to trusted moderators or the legal team upon request. Please let me know the appropriate next steps.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Jeanette Wilson
www.jeanettewilson.com 222.155.96.209 (talk) 18:29, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your previously aired concerns about the article did not gain traction at the BLP Noticeboard with most of the sources being considered decent. You are welcome to create a new post on that noticeboard, but it seems unlikely you'll get a different result. You should also be aware of our policy on WP:OUTING if your video connects Wikipedia contributors to real-life people.-Gadfium (talk) 04:04, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello editors,
I am writing to request the immediate review of the article on Jeanette Wilson, which contains numerous factual inaccuracies and appears to have been influenced by a coordinated defamation effort.
I am a spiritual teacher, healer, medium, TV personality, and author with a longstanding professional career in New Zealand and the UK . The current article includes serious errors and false claims:
I did not become a medium after my grandfather died (he passed away when I was six).
I am not anti-vaccine; I support good science and responsible health dialogue.
I do not promote unproven supplements or offer dangerous COVID-19 advice.
My sessions do not involve spirit possession or humming,> I have never claimed to cure arthritis.
I have never spoken to John of God, he is not my mentor.
The timeline of events is inaccurate (the 20/20 episode aired before the TV3 series).
There is no mention of my SY TV series Spirit Medium;Jeanette Wilson
Several of the quotes attributed to me were taken not from a public event but from a private session Susan Gerbic posing as Joanne Nielson, tried to set up a sting. Susan thought she was joining me on an event where I passed on messages but she came in on a session where people meditated and connected with their own loved one. Frustrated by this she was determined to get me for something else as it was 2am in the morning ( all of this is on the video I can send you)
Additionally, quotes from known skeptics Vicki Hyde and Michael Marshall are present in the article. In the video I have, it is said that (Redacted) had contacted all my UK events to stop them happening. The individuals who edited the oage are part of a group who were planning and discussing actions to damage my reputation and sabotage my public events in the UK. This undermines the neutrality of the article and calls into question the integrity of its creation.
I respectfully request this article be nominated for deletion or, at the very least, be heavily edited under neutral oversight. I am happy to provide my video evidence and supporting documentation through appropriate channels.
Hi just found my user account that I must have set up when I first found this page had been created. If it helps I can go through each of the statements on the page in turn saying why they are inaccurate, for background, impartial editors need to know when this page was created by whom and why. It was created by (Redacted) at the behest of (Redacted) and (Redacted). I have a video of (Redacted) saying this. It was done at a time that I was about to tour the UK. (Redacted) wrote to each of my venues to try and stop my events and in the video I have he is talking to (Redacted) about this. In that same video (Redacted) says she has editors that she trains to be Wikipedia editors. She says, gleefully, that she has just submitted a delete request for another psychic a lady in Australia. (Redacted) is quoted on my page. It was he that got one of the newspaper articles written. (Redacted) says on the video that he came to one of my events, saw about 15 people there, but did not pay to get in. The reporter also did not come to my event. I film all my shows. If I was doing the things I am accused of would I really be filming all my shows. There are over 1000 videos of my work online. Andrew Carter is listed as my business partner - he is not - where is the evidence for this? It is said John of God is my mentor? what evidence is there of that. I have never even spoken to John of God. Anti vaxxer - what evidence? In a separate video (Redacted) attempts what she calls a 'sting' on me - after 2 hours on the call she is exasperated as she has not got me to say anything that would provide evidence. The video I have shows her saying she is determined to get something on me. She asked me aboout covid ad I talked about a product that my mother had used for COPD (not COVID) it is not a product I sell - I had to order it for her from the US. I can go on. Let me know if this input is useful. Peace11111 (talk) 10:15, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
surely that discussion needs to take into account the video evidence I have? The videos show clear malicious intent and that the ringleader trains Wiki editors to do her work. Without doing that sone of the reviewing editors may be part of her team and then the decision made will not be impartial. Peace11111 (talk) 09:23, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do not, under any circumstances, anywhere on the Wikipedia site, make any statement with any real-world detail about any Wikipedia editor that they have not explicitly mentioned themselves on-wiki. That is a violation of the WP:OUTING policy. Doing so again will trigger a block on your accounts. If you have evidence of off-wiki details that you feel affect article content, there are non-public ways of submitting it. DMacks (talk) 13:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As the subject of this article, I wonder do you have access to any WP:RS source(s) that provide(s) an accurate date and place of birth? These are very basic details common to most WP:BLP articles. Many thanks for your help. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:24, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]