Jump to content

Talk:Fuck Tree

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Launchballer talk 03:40, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the Fuck Tree has been described as a "physical embodiment of desire"?
Created by No Swan So Fine (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 128 past nominations.

No Swan So Fine (talk) 22:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]

I wouldn't promote the image as far too poorly lit to meet WP:DYKIMG. I don't find the hook interesting, but I can suggest ALT1: ... that the Fuck Tree has been used for gay sex since the 19th century?--Launchballer 12:32, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No free image?

[edit]

Really...? I mean, don't we have a large Wikipedian community in London? Sigh Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:13, 17 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will ask over on Wikipedia:WikiProject London and Commons:Commons:File requests. Hopefully something comes up. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 13:06, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Slenderness versus prone

[edit]

The current first paragraph describes the tree as "noted for its slender trunk which facilitates gay sex," however the extended prone portion of the trunk seems to more accurately explain its usefulness for gay sex. There's seemingly no explanation for why the slenderness of the trunk is valuable for that purpose, or any reference to validate that it is noted for slenderness. TraceySwans (talk) 16:41, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]