Talk:Fuck Tree
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Fuck Tree appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 June 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Launchballer talk 03:40, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Fuck Tree has been described as a "physical embodiment of desire"?
Created by No Swan So Fine (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 128 past nominations.
No Swan So Fine (talk) 22:39, 21 April 2025 (UTC).
Date, size, copyvio spotcheck, hook, QPQ, etc. GTG. Shame we have no image. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:13, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- Comment, I have renamed the page from "The Fuck Tree" to just "Fuck Tree" per WP:THE and have slightly altered the hook to reflect that link change. Just thought I'd let it be known. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 13:24, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
- Another comment, since the subject now has a free photo, could this be turned into an image hook? ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 17:38, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
No free image?
[edit]Really...? I mean, don't we have a large Wikipedian community in London? Sigh Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:13, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- I think I will ask over on Wikipedia:WikiProject London and Commons:Commons:File requests. Hopefully something comes up. ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 13:06, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Slenderness versus prone
[edit]The current first paragraph describes the tree as "noted for its slender trunk which facilitates gay sex," however the extended prone portion of the trunk seems to more accurately explain its usefulness for gay sex. There's seemingly no explanation for why the slenderness of the trunk is valuable for that purpose, or any reference to validate that it is noted for slenderness. TraceySwans (talk) 16:41, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- Start-Class London-related articles
- Low-importance London-related articles
- Start-Class plant articles
- Low-importance plant articles
- WikiProject Plants articles
- Start-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Low-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- Sexology and sexuality articles without infoboxes
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- Articles created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride 2025
- Wikipedia Did you know articles