Jump to content

Talk:Flint Dibble

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

The link to his official page at Cardiff is dead. Kdammers (talk) 06:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to fix it by running the archive bot on the page, but I'm not sure it has an archive... – Joe (talk) 07:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No okay, found and added it manually. – Joe (talk) 07:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

[edit]

There's zero reason to insert ad hominem attacks in this article. Flint Dibble is clearly incompetent when it comes to engineering and machining, but no one's calling him a pseudoengineer when he steps outside of his area of competence. Similarly, Graham Hancock might have some crackpot theories, but respectable publications don't publish personal attacks like this. 69.180.15.57 (talk) 11:13, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that Archaeological Review isn't a respectable publication? Doug Weller talk 11:49, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That Hancock is a pseudoarcheologist is clearly established by reliable sources. It is the consensus opinion of archeologists and editors on this page. This has been discussed a lot. DolyaIskrina (talk) 23:10, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]