Jump to content

Talk:Faisal I of Iraq

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Photo

[edit]

I wanted to add this photo

Faisal in Amman

but the Commons data says it is from 1917 which I think is unlikely. Padres Hana (talk) 14:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 February 2022

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Favonian (talk) 08:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Faisal I of Iraq and SyriaFaisal I of Iraq – He wasn't ruler of the two countries simultaneously and the current title was moved without discussion. 67.173.23.66 (talk) 02:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:58, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

[edit]

Do we have any pictures of Faisal during the 1918-1920 Syrian Kingdom period? Makeandtoss (talk) 11:08, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 May 2025

[edit]

Faisal I of IraqFaisal I – Around 2 months ago, I closed an RM on Faisal II, where consensus seemed to want to move "Faisal I of Iraq" to "Faisal I". I personally have no opinion regarding the matter, but since I can't move this article based on the other's RM, I'm opening this RM instead. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 22:34, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Chicdat, @Rreagan007, @Chipmunkdavis, @Makeandtoss, and @ModernDayTrilobite for comment. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 22:36, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, clarification needed due to another Faisali king in Saudi Arabia, and per WP’s naming policy for royalty. Makeandtoss (talk) 22:38, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as per my last comment: No Saudi Arabian monarch has used a regnal number (look where Salman I redirects to). Since Faisal I has not been contested for twenty-one years, it is clearly considered the primary topic considering the lack of regnal numbers for Saudi Arabian kings. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 23:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support given this is a formal RM. I also have no strong opinion, but as Chicdat notes the redirect points here already so this makes sense as a technical move to remove unnecessary disambiguation. CMD (talk) 01:48, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]