Jump to content

Talk:Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeEric Harris and Dylan Klebold was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 6, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed
December 21, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed
July 11, 2022Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Semi-protected edit request on 18 December 2024

[edit]

CURRENT: Harris and Klebold have become pop culture icons, with the pair often portrayed, referenced and seen in film, television, video games, music and books. Many killers since the shooting have taken inspiration from the pair (dubbed the Columbine effect), either hailing them as heroes or expressing sympathy for them. Harris and Klebold also have a fanbase, who have coined the term "Columbiners", who write fan fiction and draw fan art of them. Others have also dressed as the duo for cosplay or Halloween.[11]

NEW: Harris and Klebold are reminders of sad pathetic, lost kids, who through their cowardly actions have harmed others. 2600:4040:A5BC:A100:39A9:1D0C:ADE9:3768 (talk) 23:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: proposed text doesn't have an appropriate encyclopedic formal tone and removes key information about their impact. ObserveOwl 🎄 (talk) 00:36, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"key information about their impact?" what are you talking about. this the most bizarre paragraph I've ever seen in wikipedia. 1) it's inaccurate. I don't know single person who can name both of these people by name. I can't think of a single time I've seen them referenced in pop culture. 2) it's not consistent with any other wikipedia articles I've seen.
obviously it's not going to be replaced with the line about "sad pathetic losers". If you want to discuss the impact of these two on culture in an ACTUAL ENCYCLOPEDIC TONE, with sources that actually matter, feel free. but this section needs to be dramatically revised. Something that makes them sound like popstars is absolutely unacceptable. GrandMote (talk) 20:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Day Creature (talk) 04:05, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is that we're being asked to prove a negative. This paragraph is filled with unsourced material that most likely original research. There is a single citation which does not justify the body of the text. I don't have a problem just deleting it outright but I don't want to hear any static if I do. GrandMote (talk) 22:33, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]