Talk:EF5 drought

EF5 drought has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 25, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Weather: Thunderstorms / Tornadoes / General Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tornadoes portal This article is supported by WikiProject Severe weather (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the General meteorology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from EF5 drought appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 March 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that while six EF5 tornadoes hit the United States during the 2011 tornado season, there has not been an EF5 tornado in more than ten years?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2025/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/EF5 drought.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 18:02, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that while six EF5 tornadoes hit the United States during the 2011 tornado season, there hasn't been an EF5 tornado in over ten years?

Source: https://www.abc57.com/news/ef5-tornado-drought-continues

ALT1: ... that the EF5 drought has spanned over ten years? Source: https://www.abc57.com/news/ef5-tornado-drought-continues
ALT2: ... that a study found that the currently-active EF5 drought has a 0.3% chance of happening for as long as it has been? Source: https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/aop/BAMS-D-24-0066.1/BAMS-D-24-0066.1.xml?tab_body=pdf
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Qizil Armies
Comment: ~~It's currently nighttime over here, so I'll nom tonight and QPQ tomorrow (I promise this time, lol). Feel free to reword hooks, the wording seems off to me.~~

Created by EF5 (talk) and Tails Wx (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 18 past nominations.

E_F⁵ 02:16, 3 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

Well first of all I must say that EF5 is probably the best name of a person to nominate this article. The article looks good (is new/long enough and Earwig's is clear). The ALT0 hook is interesting and matches the article. The provided source is from 2021 (8 years since the drought began) so that source doesn't support the hook but the sources in the article do so there's no issue. Just waiting on the QPQ. ―Panamitsu (talk) 05:47, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Panamitsu: Done! :) E_F⁵ 13:56, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go. ―Panamitsu (talk) 21:09, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New Harmony tornado

@EF5: I see the New Harmony tornado listed as an EF4 on pages for the 2011 Super Outbreak. Where are you getting that it was rated EF3? TornadoLGS (talk) 18:04, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TornadoLGS, I had confused it with the Glade Spring, VA tornado from the same day. — E_F⁵ 18:08, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:47, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:EF5 drought/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: EF5 (talk · contribs) 12:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 23:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will do this one for WP:GARC.

Comments

Comments will start today. History6042😊 (Contact me) 10:58, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No images need fair use rationals so that's fine. They are also relevant. History6042😊 (Contact me) 10:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Earwig found some copyvio issues. One is a quote, the other seems to be an actual issue, @EF5. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042, which one? — ^EF⁵ 01:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. The Reddit user is a Wikipedia editor themselves, they worked on this article. — ^EF⁵ 01:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, copyvios are fine then. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042, would you link me to ping them for confirmation? — ^EF⁵ 01:09, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please, just to make sure. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:09, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@WeatherWriter: Hope you don't mind the ping. — ^EF⁵ 01:15, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What's the issue? No diffs or specifics were given here, so I do not know what I need to confirm? The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 01:34, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We would like to see if a Reddit source that seems to have a copyvio with this article was written by you. EF5 says it was and is therefore fine. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:39, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a link to the post [reddit.com/r/tornado/comments/1f4j4mp/interesting_heartbreaking_facts_about_every_ef4] History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:39, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 01:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:47, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Article is stable and neutral. History6042😊 (Contact me) 00:05, 6 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Scope is all good. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:13, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is Max Olson Chase a reliable YouTube channel? History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:17, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will spotcheck sources; 3, 11, 22, and 34. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All are good, I will check grammar now. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:49, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"rated as a high-end EF4, with" -> "rated as high-end EF4s, with"
"and were anchored" -> "and was anchored"
Please use US english, an example being meters not metres.

Once you fix these I can pass the article. @EF5 History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:55, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reping, @EF5. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:03, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reping, @EF5. History6042😊 (Contact me) 01:52, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042: EF5 is on a travel WikiBreak until the 21st. Departure– (talk) 02:07, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I apologize, I did not see this and will fix the issues myself, and then pass it. History6042😊 (Contact me) 02:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, sorry. I'll get to it once I get back. ^EF⁵ 15:22, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@EF5, reping. History6042😊 (Contact me) 11:45, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done all; I don't see where US english isn't being used. — ^EF⁵ 13:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042: Issues addressed. — ^EF⁵ 13:20, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pass History6042😊 (Contact me) 19:46, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042, it's for an uncontroversial quote, so probably. — ^EF⁵ 12:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.