Talk:Carl the Collector/GA1

GA review

Passed. IAWW (talk) 19:34, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Lazman321 (talk · contribs) 21:24, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 12:31, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @DaniloDaysOfOurLives and I are working very hard to review every single GA nomination in the television section. Consider joining us to clear the backlog!

I'll review this one. I watched some clips of this show on YouTube and I am now thoroughly invested... IAWW (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lazman321 Comments are below. This was super fun to review! IAWW (talk) 20:53, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@IAWW: Thank you for your review. All concerns addressed. Lazman321 (talk) 18:20, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lazman321 I'm happy with your changes. Passing now. IAWW (talk) 19:33, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prose (Criteria 1a, 1b, 4) clock

Lead

There is some information in the infobox that is not in the article. This should not be the case MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE, and it is unsourced. IAWW (talk) 12:56, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Premise

Looks good :)

Cast

Looks good :)

Production

as he felt that the stigma surrounding disabilities would diminish: The way this is worded implies the stigma is an established fact, which would need better sourcing. I suggest rewording to emphasize that the existence of a stigma is part of his opinion, or adding a source that there is a stigma around disabilities like Austism and ADHD. IAWW (talk) 12:56, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes

Carl agrees to take of the mug at home: Not sure what this is meant to mean IAWW (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

to participate with each other their activities at the same time: Doesn't make sense IAWW (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcast and reception

Looks good :)

Sources Y

Health/formatting (Criterion 2a) Y

No issues for GA

Reliability (Criterion 2b) Y

Almost all news and magazines. No issues here.

Spot check (Criteria 2b, 2c, 2d) Y

[1a]: Y

[3d, 4a]: Y

[8b]: Y

[14]: Y

Copyvio (Criterion 2d) Y

Earwig finds nothing. I found no issues on the spot check.

Scope (Criteria 3a, 3b) Y

It appears to cover everything

Stable (Criterion 5) Y

Media Y

Tags (Criterion 6a) Y

Captions (Criterion 6b) Y

Suggestions (not needed for GA promotion)

Suggest archiving the remaining unarchived links IAWW (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.